JLPT Test N1 in 07/2023

N12023/JulyGrammar & Reading
Q18 Questions
T~36 minutes
S6 Sections

ๅ•้กŒ8 ๆฌกใฎๆ–‡็ซ ใ‚’่ชญใ‚“ใงใ€ ๅพŒใฎๅ•ใ„ใซๅฏพใ™ใ‚‹็ญ”ใˆใจใ—ใฆใ€ ๆœ€ใ‚‚ใ‚ˆใ„ใ‚‚ใฎใ‚’1ใƒป2ใƒป3ใƒป4 ใ‹ใ‚‰ไธ€ใค ้ธใณใชใ•ใ„ใ€‚

Reading Passage

๏ผˆ1๏ผ‰
ๆƒ…ๅ ฑ็คพไผšใ€ใ‚ใ‚‹ใ„ใฏๆƒ…ๅ ฑๅŒ–็คพไผšใจ่จ€ใฃใฆใ‚‚ใ„ใ„ใงใ™ใŒใ€ใใ“ใงๆ‡ธๅ‘ฝใซ็”Ÿใใฆใ„ใ“ใ†ใจใ™ใ‚‹ใจใ€ใพใšๅ‡บใฆใใ‚‹ๆ‚ฒ้ณดใŒใ‚ใ‚Šใพใ™ใ€‚ใคใพใ‚Šใ€ใ‚ใพใ‚Šใซใ‚‚ๅคšใใฎๆƒ…ๅ ฑใŒใ‚ใฃใฆใ€ใใฎไธญใฎใฉใ‚ŒใŒๆœฌๅฝ“ใชใฎใ‹ใ€ไฝ•ใ‚’้ธใ‚“ใ ใ‚‰ใ„ใ„ใ‹ใ‚ใ‹ใ‚‰ใชใ„ใ€‚ไปŠใ€ๆต่กŒใฃใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ‚‚ใฎใฎๆƒ…ๅ ฑใซ็†ฑๅฟƒใงใ‚ใ‚Œใฐใ‚ใ‚‹ใปใฉใ€ไธ–้–“ใงๆต่กŒใฃใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใ‚’็Ÿฅใ‚‰ใชใ„ใจ่‡ชๅˆ†ใŒ้…ใ‚Œใ‚‹ใ‚“ใ˜ใ‚ƒใชใ„ใ‹ใ€ใจใ„ใ†็„ฆใ‚ŠใฟใŸใ„ใชใ‚‚ใฎใŒไบบ้–“ใ‚’็ชใๅ‹•ใ‹ใ™ใฎใŒๆƒ…ๅ ฑๅŒ–็คพไผšใฎ็‰นๅพดใงใ™ใ€‚

๏ผˆ2๏ผ‰
ไปฅไธ‹ใฏใ€ใ€Œๆ›ธใใ“ใจใ€ใซใคใ„ใฆ่ฟฐในใŸใ‚‚ใฎใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€‚

ใ€Œๆ€ใฃใŸใ“ใจใ€ใ‚„ใ€Œ่€ƒใˆใŸใ“ใจใ€ใจใ„ใ†ๆŠฝ่ฑก็š„ใชๅญ˜ๅœจใŒๆ–‡ๅญ—ใจใ„ใ†ๅ…ทไฝ“็š„ใชๅญ˜ๅœจใซๅค‰ๅŒ–ใ—ใŸ็žฌ้–“ใ€ใใฎ็ญ†่€…ใฏ่‡ชๅˆ†่‡ช่บซใฎใ€Œๆ€ใฃใŸใ“ใจใ€ใ‚„ใ€Œ่€ƒใˆใŸใ“ใจใ€ใ‚’ใ€็›ดๆŽฅใ€่‡ชๅˆ†ใฎ็›ฎใงใ€Œ่ฆ‹ใŸใ€ใ“ใจใซใชใ‚‹ใ€‚ใคใพใ‚Šใ€ๅฎข่ฆณ็š„ใซใ€Œ่ฆณๅฏŸใ€ใ™ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใซใชใ‚‹ใ‚ใ‘ใ ใ€‚ใ€Œๆ›ธใใ“ใจใ€ใฏใ€Œ่ชญใ‚€ใ“ใจใ€ใ€‚่‡ชๅˆ†ใฎๆ–‡็ซ ใ‚’่ชญใฟใชใŒใ‚‰ๆ›ธใ้€ฒใ‚ใ‚‹ใฎใŒใ€ใ€Œๆ›ธใใ€ใจใ„ใ†ไฝœๆฅญใชใฎใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€‚่ฆณๅฏŸใฏใปใจใ‚“ใฉๅฟ…็„ถ็š„ใซใ€Œๆ‰นๅˆคใ€ใฎใ“ใ“ใ‚ใ‚’ๅ‘ผใณ่ตทใ“ใ™ใ€‚ใ€Œๆ€ใฃใŸใ“ใจใ€ใ‚„ใ€Œ่€ƒใˆใŸใ“ใจใ€ใฎๅพŒใใ‚„็”˜ใ•ใ‚’ใ€ๆ›ธใ„ใŸ็žฌ้–“ใซๆ€ใ„็Ÿฅใ‚‰ใ•ใ‚Œใ‚‹ใฎใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€‚

๏ผˆ3๏ผ‰
ๆ˜”ใจๆฏ”ในใฆใƒขใƒŽใŒๅฃฒใ‚Œใชใใชใ‚Šใ€ๅบƒๅ‘Šใฎๅƒใใ‚‚ๆ‚ชใใชใฃใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€่กจ็พใฎ้ข็™ฝใ•ใ‚„ๆ–ฐๅฅ‡ๆ€งใฐใฃใ‹ใ‚Šใซ่ตฐใฃใฆใ—ใพใ†ใ€‚ใ€‚ใ€‚่ฆใฏใ€ๆœฌๆฅใ€ๆœ€ใ‚‚ๅคงๅˆ‡ใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใฏใšใฎๆถˆ่ฒป่€…ๅฟƒ็†ใฎใƒ„ใƒœใ‚’ๅๅˆ†ใซ็ชใใใ‚Œใฆใ„ใชใ„ใ€ๅˆ†ๆžใ—ใใ‚Œใฆใ„ใชใ„ใ€ใ„ใ‚ใฐ่กจ้ขไธŠใฎใ€่กจ็พใซใ“ใ ใ‚ใฃใŸๅบƒๅ‘ŠใŒๅข—ใˆใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ‚ˆใ†ใซๆ„Ÿใ˜ใพใ™ใ€‚

ๆถˆ่ฒป่€…ๅฟƒ็†ใฏใ€Œๆœฌ่ณชใ€ใ€่กจ็พใฏใ€Œไผใˆๆ–นใ€ใจใ‚‚่จ€ใ„ๆ›ใˆใ‚‰ใ‚Œใพใ™ใŒใ€ๆœ€ใ‚‚ๅคงๅˆ‡ใชๆœฌ่ณชใ‚’้‡่ฆ–ใ›ใšใ€่กจ้ขไธŠใฎไผใˆๆ–นใฐใ‹ใ‚Šใซ้‡ใใŒ็ฝฎใ‹ใ‚Œใ‚‹ใ‚ˆใ†ใซใชใฃใฆใ„ใ‚‹็Šถๆณใฏใ€ใ„ใ‹ใŒใชใ‚‚ใฎใงใ—ใ‚‡ใ†ใ‹๏ผŸๆœฌ่ณชใชใใจใ“ใ‚ใซ่‰ฏใ„ไผใˆๆ–นใชใฉๅญ˜ๅœจใ™ใ‚‹ใฏใšใŒใชใ„ใฎใงใ™ใ€‚

๏ผˆ4๏ผ‰
่ชžใ‚Šๅˆใˆใฐ่ชžใ‚Šๅˆใ†ใปใฉไป–ไบบใจ่‡ชๅˆ†ใจใฎ้•ใ„ใŒใ‚ˆใ‚Š็นŠ็ดฐใซใ‚ใ‹ใ‚‹ใ‚ˆใ†ใซใชใ‚‹ใ“ใจใ€‚ใใ‚ŒใŒๅฏพ่ฉฑใ ใ€‚
ใ€Œใ‚ใ‹ใ‚Šใ‚ใˆใชใ„ใ€ใ€Œไผใ‚ใ‚‰ใชใ„ใ€ใจใ„ใ†ๆˆธๆƒ‘ใ„ใ‚„็—›ใฟใ‹ใ‚‰ๅ‡บ็™บใ™ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใ€‚ใใ‚Œใฏใ€ไธๅฏๆฌ ใชใ‚‚ใฎใซๅฟƒใ‚’้–‹ใใ“ใจใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€‚ใใฎใ“ใจใงใ€ใฒใจใฏใ‚ˆใ‚Š็†ฑใ„ๅฏพ่ฉฑใ‚’ใ™ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใŒใงใใ‚‹ใ‚ˆใ†ใซใชใ‚‹ใ€‚ๅฏพ่ฉฑใฎใชใ‹ใงใฟใšใ‹ใ‚‰ใฎๆ€่€ƒใ‚’ใ‚‚้›ใˆใฆใ„ใใ€‚ใ‚ˆใใ‚ˆใ่€ƒใˆใŸใ†ใˆใงๅฃใซใ•ใ‚Œใ‚‹ไป–ไบบใฎ็•ฐใชใ‚‹ๆ€ใ„ใ‚„่€ƒใˆใซใ€ใ“ใ‚ŒใพใŸใ‚ˆใ่€ณใ‚’ๆพ„ใพใ™ใ“ใจใงใ€ใ˜ใถใ‚“ใฎ่€ƒใˆใ‚’ๅ†็‚นๆคœใ—ใฏใ˜ใ‚ใ‚‹ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ ใ€‚
English Summary & Annotations
This section discusses various aspects of modern society. Passage (1) describes the anxiety in an 'information society' (ๆƒ…ๅ ฑ็คพไผš: jลhล shakai) where people feel pressured to keep up with 'trends' (ๆต่กŒใฃใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ‚‚ใฎ: hayatteiru mono) to avoid falling behind. Passage (2) explains that 'writing' (ๆ›ธใใ“ใจ: kaku koto) is an act of self-observation and 'criticism' (ๆ‰นๅˆค: hihan), where one realizes the flaws and weaknesses of their own thoughts upon writing them down. Passage (3) criticizes modern advertising for prioritizing 'expression' (ไผใˆๆ–น: tsutaekata) over 'consumer psychology' (ๆถˆ่ฒป่€…ๅฟƒ็†: shลhisha shinri), which is the 'essence' (ๆœฌ่ณช: honshitsu), arguing that good expression cannot exist without essence. Passage (4) defines 'dialogue' (ๅฏพ่ฉฑ: taiwa) as a process of understanding subtle differences between oneself and others, which helps refine one's own thinking by re-examining one's ideas based on others' thoughts.
Question 45

็ญ†่€…ใฎ่€ƒใˆใซๅˆใ†ใฎใฏใฉใ‚Œใ‹ใ€‚

1.ๆƒ…ๅ ฑใ‚’ๆฑ‚ใ‚ใ‚‹ไบบใปใฉใ€็Ÿฅใ‚‰ใชใ„ๆƒ…ๅ ฑใŒใ‚ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใซไธๅฎ‰ใ‚’ๆ„Ÿใ˜ใ‚‹ใ€‚ Correct
2.ๆƒ…ๅ ฑใ‚’ๅพ—ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใซ็†ฑๅฟƒใชไบบใฏใ€ไธ–้–“ใงๆต่กŒใฃใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใ—ใ‹็Ÿฅใ‚‰ใชใ„ใ€‚
3.ๅคšใใฎๆƒ…ๅ ฑใ‹ใ‚‰ๅฟ…่ฆใชใ‚‚ใฎใŒ้ธในใชใ‘ใ‚Œใฐใ€ไธ–้–“ใ‹ใ‚‰้…ใ‚Œใฆใ—ใพใ†ใ€‚
4.ๆต่กŒใฃใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ‚‚ใฎใฎๆƒ…ๅ ฑใซ็†ฑๅฟƒใชใ ใ‘ใงใฏใ€ๆƒ…ๅ ฑๅŒ–็คพไผšใง็”Ÿใใ‚‰ใ‚Œใชใ„ใ€‚
Correct Answer: 1. ๆƒ…ๅ ฑใ‚’ๆฑ‚ใ‚ใ‚‹ไบบใปใฉใ€็Ÿฅใ‚‰ใชใ„ๆƒ…ๅ ฑใŒใ‚ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใซไธๅฎ‰ใ‚’ๆ„Ÿใ˜ใ‚‹ใ€‚
Detailed Explanation
Why this is correct:

The passage states that the more enthusiastic people are about trending information, the more anxious they become about not knowing what's popular, fearing they might fall behind. Option 1, 'ๆƒ…ๅ ฑใ‚’ๆฑ‚ใ‚ใ‚‹ไบบใปใฉใ€็Ÿฅใ‚‰ใชใ„ๆƒ…ๅ ฑใŒใ‚ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใซไธๅฎ‰ใ‚’ๆ„Ÿใ˜ใ‚‹ใ€‚' (The more people seek information, the more anxious they feel about not knowing certain information), directly reflects this anxiety described as a characteristic of the information society.

Why other options are incorrect:
ๆƒ…ๅ ฑใ‚’ๅพ—ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใซ็†ฑๅฟƒใชไบบใฏใ€ไธ–้–“ใงๆต่กŒใฃใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใ—ใ‹็Ÿฅใ‚‰ใชใ„ใ€‚

The passage does not state that enthusiastic information seekers only know what's popular; rather, it implies they are driven by anxiety about *not* knowing everything popular.

ๅคšใใฎๆƒ…ๅ ฑใ‹ใ‚‰ๅฟ…่ฆใชใ‚‚ใฎใŒ้ธในใชใ‘ใ‚Œใฐใ€ไธ–้–“ใ‹ใ‚‰้…ใ‚Œใฆใ—ใพใ†ใ€‚

The passage mentions that if one cannot choose what's necessary from vast information, it leads to anxiety about falling behind, but it doesn't state this as a direct consequence of *not being able to choose*. The core anxiety is about *not knowing* what's popular.

ๆต่กŒใฃใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ‚‚ใฎใฎๆƒ…ๅ ฑใซ็†ฑๅฟƒใชใ ใ‘ใงใฏใ€ๆƒ…ๅ ฑๅŒ–็คพไผšใง็”Ÿใใ‚‰ใ‚Œใชใ„ใ€‚

The passage describes being enthusiastic about trends as a characteristic that *drives* people in the information society, not as something insufficient for living in it.

Question 46

็ญ†่€…ใซใ‚ˆใ‚‹ใจใ€ใ€Œๆ›ธใใ“ใจใ€ใซใ‚ˆใฃใฆใฉใ†ใชใ‚‹ใ‹ใ€‚

1.่‡ช่บซใฎๆ–ฐใ—ใ„่€ƒใˆๆ–นใซๆฐ—ใฅใใ€‚
2.่‡ช่บซใฎๆ„่ฆ‹ใ‚’ๅ…ทไฝ“็š„ใซไผใˆใ‚‰ใ‚Œใ‚‹ใ€‚
3.่‡ช่บซใฎๆ„่ฆ‹ใ‚’ๆ‰นๅˆค็š„ใซ่ฆ‹ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใŒใงใใ‚‹ใ€‚ Correct
4.่‡ช่บซใฎใ“ใ“ใ‚ใฎๅค‰ๅŒ–ใ‚’่ฆณๅฏŸใ™ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใŒใงใใ‚‹ใ€‚
Correct Answer: 3. ่‡ช่บซใฎๆ„่ฆ‹ใ‚’ๆ‰นๅˆค็š„ใซ่ฆ‹ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใŒใงใใ‚‹ใ€‚
Detailed Explanation
Why this is correct:

The passage explains that when abstract thoughts become concrete words, the writer 'sees' their own thoughts objectively, leading to 'observation' and almost inevitably 'criticism'. It states, 'ใ€Œๆ€ใฃใŸใ“ใจใ€ใ‚„ใ€Œ่€ƒใˆใŸใ“ใจใ€ใฎๅพŒใใ‚„็”˜ใ•ใ‚’ใ€ๆ›ธใ„ใŸ็žฌ้–“ใซๆ€ใ„็Ÿฅใ‚‰ใ•ใ‚Œใ‚‹ใฎใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€‚' (One realizes the flaws and weaknesses of their thoughts the moment they write them down). Option 3, '่‡ช่บซใฎๆ„่ฆ‹ใ‚’ๆ‰นๅˆค็š„ใซ่ฆ‹ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใŒใงใใ‚‹ใ€‚' (One can view their own opinions critically), directly aligns with this idea of self-criticism through writing.

Why other options are incorrect:
่‡ช่บซใฎๆ–ฐใ—ใ„่€ƒใˆๆ–นใซๆฐ—ใฅใใ€‚

While writing can lead to new insights, the passage emphasizes the critical observation of existing thoughts, not necessarily the discovery of new ones.

่‡ช่บซใฎๆ„่ฆ‹ใ‚’ๅ…ทไฝ“็š„ใซไผใˆใ‚‰ใ‚Œใ‚‹ใ€‚

The passage focuses on the internal process of writing as self-observation and criticism, not primarily on communicating opinions to others.

่‡ช่บซใฎใ“ใ“ใ‚ใฎๅค‰ๅŒ–ใ‚’่ฆณๅฏŸใ™ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใŒใงใใ‚‹ใ€‚

The passage talks about observing and criticizing one's *thoughts and ideas* (ๆ€ใฃใŸใ“ใจใ‚„่€ƒใˆใŸใ“ใจ), not changes in one's 'kokoro' (ใ“ใ“ใ‚: heart/mind) in a general sense.

Question 47

็ญ†่€…ใฎ่€ƒใˆใซๅˆใ†ใฎใฏใฉใ‚Œใ‹ใ€‚

1.ๆถˆ่ฒป่€…ๅฟƒ็†ใ‚’ๆ‰ใˆใŸๅบƒๅ‘Šไฝœใ‚Šใฏใ€ๆ˜”ใ‚ˆใ‚Š้›ฃใ—ใใชใฃใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ€‚
2.ๆถˆ่ฒป่€…ๅฟƒ็†ใ‚’ๆ‰ใˆใฆใ„ใชใ„ใฎใฏใ€่‰ฏใ„ๅบƒๅ‘Šใจใฏ่จ€ใˆใชใ„ใ€‚ Correct
3.ๆถˆ่ฒป่€…ๅฟƒ็†ใ‚’ๆ‰ใˆใฆใ„ใ‚Œใฐใ€ๅบƒๅ‘Šใฏ่กจ็พใซใ“ใ ใ‚ใ‚‹ๅฟ…่ฆใฏใชใ„ใ€‚
4.ๆถˆ่ฒป่€…ๅฟƒ็†ใ‚’ๆ‰ใˆใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ ใ‘ใงใฏใ€ๅŠนใ็›ฎใฎใ‚ใ‚‹ๅบƒๅ‘Šใซใฏใชใ‚‰ใชใ„ใ€‚
Correct Answer: 2. ๆถˆ่ฒป่€…ๅฟƒ็†ใ‚’ๆ‰ใˆใฆใ„ใชใ„ใฎใฏใ€่‰ฏใ„ๅบƒๅ‘Šใจใฏ่จ€ใˆใชใ„ใ€‚
Detailed Explanation
Why this is correct:

The author argues that advertisements are increasingly focusing on 'expression' (ไผใˆๆ–น) rather than the 'essence' (ๆœฌ่ณช) of consumer psychology. The passage states, 'ๆœฌ่ณชใชใใจใ“ใ‚ใซ่‰ฏใ„ไผใˆๆ–นใชใฉๅญ˜ๅœจใ™ใ‚‹ใฏใšใŒใชใ„ใฎใงใ™ใ€‚' (There can be no good way of conveying something where there is no essence). This means that if consumer psychology (the essence) is not captured, the advertisement is not good. Option 2, 'ๆถˆ่ฒป่€…ๅฟƒ็†ใ‚’ๆ‰ใˆใฆใ„ใชใ„ใฎใฏใ€่‰ฏใ„ๅบƒๅ‘Šใจใฏ่จ€ใˆใชใ„ใ€‚' (An advertisement that doesn't capture consumer psychology cannot be called a good advertisement), directly reflects this core argument.

Why other options are incorrect:
ๆถˆ่ฒป่€…ๅฟƒ็†ใ‚’ๆ‰ใˆใŸๅบƒๅ‘Šไฝœใ‚Šใฏใ€ๆ˜”ใ‚ˆใ‚Š้›ฃใ—ใใชใฃใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ€‚

The passage states that things are not selling as well as before, and advertising is less effective, leading to a focus on novelty, but it doesn't explicitly say that capturing consumer psychology is *harder* than before, just that it's being neglected.

ๆถˆ่ฒป่€…ๅฟƒ็†ใ‚’ๆ‰ใˆใฆใ„ใ‚Œใฐใ€ๅบƒๅ‘Šใฏ่กจ็พใซใ“ใ ใ‚ใ‚‹ๅฟ…่ฆใฏใชใ„ใ€‚

The author emphasizes that essence is paramount, but doesn't say expression is unnecessary if essence is captured. Rather, good expression *cannot exist* without essence.

ๆถˆ่ฒป่€…ๅฟƒ็†ใ‚’ๆ‰ใˆใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ ใ‘ใงใฏใ€ๅŠนใ็›ฎใฎใ‚ใ‚‹ๅบƒๅ‘Šใซใฏใชใ‚‰ใชใ„ใ€‚

The passage implies that capturing consumer psychology (the essence) is the *most important* thing for effective advertising, not that it's insufficient on its own.

Question 48

ๅฏพ่ฉฑใซใคใ„ใฆใ€็ญ†่€…ใฏใฉใฎใ‚ˆใ†ใซ่ฟฐในใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ‹ใ€‚

1.ไป–ไบบใจใ˜ใถใ‚“ใฎ้•ใ„ใŒๅคงใใ„ใปใฉ ใ€็†ฑใ„ๅฏพ่ฉฑใŒใงใใ‚‹ใ€‚
2.ไป–ไบบใจใฎๆ€่€ƒใฎ้•ใ„ใ‚’ๆŠŠๆกใ™ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใงใ€่‡ช่บซใฎๆ€่€ƒใŒๆทฑใ‚ใ‚‰ใ‚Œใ‚‹ใ€‚ Correct
3.ใ‚ใ‹ใ‚Šใ‚ใˆใชใ„ใจใ„ใ†ๆˆธๆƒ‘ใ„ใ‚„็—›ใฟใŒๅ…‹ๆœใงใใ€ไป–ไบบใจๅ…ฑๆ„Ÿใงใใ‚‹ใ€‚
4.ๆ€ใ„ใ‚„่€ƒใˆใ‚’่กจ็พใ™ใ‚‹่ƒฝๅŠ›ใŒ้›ใˆใ‚‰ใ‚Œใ€ไป–ไบบใซ็†่งฃใ—ใฆใ‚‚ใ‚‰ใ„ใ‚„ใ™ใใชใ‚‹ใ€‚
Correct Answer: 2. ไป–ไบบใจใฎๆ€่€ƒใฎ้•ใ„ใ‚’ๆŠŠๆกใ™ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใงใ€่‡ช่บซใฎๆ€่€ƒใŒๆทฑใ‚ใ‚‰ใ‚Œใ‚‹ใ€‚
Detailed Explanation
Why this is correct:

The passage defines dialogue as understanding the differences between oneself and others more subtly. It states that starting from the confusion and pain of 'not understanding each other' or 'not being able to convey' is essential, and by opening one's heart to what is indispensable, one can have more passionate dialogues and train one's own thinking. This is because by listening carefully to others' well-considered different thoughts, one begins to re-examine one's own. Option 2, 'ไป–ไบบใจใฎๆ€่€ƒใฎ้•ใ„ใ‚’ๆŠŠๆกใ™ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใงใ€่‡ช่บซใฎๆ€่€ƒใŒๆทฑใ‚ใ‚‰ใ‚Œใ‚‹ใ€‚' (By grasping the differences in others' thoughts, one's own thinking can be deepened), accurately summarizes this point.

Why other options are incorrect:
ไป–ไบบใจใ˜ใถใ‚“ใฎ้•ใ„ใŒๅคงใใ„ใปใฉ ใ€็†ฑใ„ๅฏพ่ฉฑใŒใงใใ‚‹ใ€‚

The passage states that dialogue helps understand differences more *subtly*, not that larger differences lead to more passionate dialogue. The passion comes from opening up to the indispensable, starting from the pain of not understanding.

ใ‚ใ‹ใ‚Šใ‚ใˆใชใ„ใจใ„ใ†ๆˆธๆƒ‘ใ„ใ‚„็—›ใฟใŒๅ…‹ๆœใงใใ€ไป–ไบบใจๅ…ฑๆ„Ÿใงใใ‚‹ใ€‚

The passage says dialogue starts from the confusion and pain of not understanding, and opening one's heart to the indispensable, but it doesn't explicitly state that this pain is *overcome* to achieve empathy. It's about understanding differences and refining one's own thoughts.

ๆ€ใ„ใ‚„่€ƒใˆใ‚’่กจ็พใ™ใ‚‹่ƒฝๅŠ›ใŒ้›ใˆใ‚‰ใ‚Œใ€ไป–ไบบใซ็†่งฃใ—ใฆใ‚‚ใ‚‰ใ„ใ‚„ใ™ใใชใ‚‹ใ€‚

The passage focuses on refining one's *own* thoughts through dialogue and understanding differences, not primarily on improving one's ability to express thoughts to be understood by others.

ๅ•้กŒ9 ๆฌกใฎๆ–‡็ซ ใ‚’่ชญใ‚“ใงใ€ ๅพŒใฎๅ•ใ„ใซๅฏพใ™ใ‚‹็ญ”ใˆใจใ—ใฆใ€ ๆœ€ใ‚‚ใ‚ˆใ„ใ‚‚ใฎใ‚’ 1ใƒป2ใƒป3ใƒป4 ใ‹ใ‚‰ไธ€ใค ้ธใณใชใ•ใ„ใ€‚

Reading Passage

(1)
ใ€Œๅธธ่ญ˜ใ‚’็–‘ใฃใฆใฟใ‚‹ใ€ใจใ„ใ†ใ“ใจใ€ๅฎŸใฏใใ‚ŒใŒๅญฆๅ•ใฎๅง‹ใพใ‚Šใงใ‚‚ใ‚ใ‚Šใพใ™ใ€‚ๅ‹‰ๅผทใŒใ€Œๅผทใ„ใฆๅ‹‰ใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€ใจใ„ใ†ๅ—ๅ‹•็š„ใชๅด้ขใ‚’ๆŒใคใ‚‚ใฎใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใชใ‚‰ใฐใ€ๅญฆๅ•ใฏใ€Œๅ•ใ†ใงๅญฆใถใ€ใ“ใจใงใ‚ใ‚Šใ€ๆฅตใ‚ใฆ่ƒฝๅ‹•็š„ใช่กŒ็‚บใงใ™ใ€‚่‡ชใ‚‰ไธปไฝ“็š„ใช่กŒ็‚บใจใ—ใฆๅ•ใ†ใ“ใจใ‚’้€šใ—ใฆใ€ๅธธ่ญ˜ใจใ•ใ‚ŒใฆใใŸใ‚‚ใฎใฎ่ฆ‹ๆ–นใ‚’็–‘ใ„ใ€ใใ‚Œใ‚’ๅฐ‘ใ—ใšใ‚‰ใ™ใชใฉใ—ใฆใ€ๅˆฅใฎ่ฆ‹ๆ–นใ‚’่ฆ‹ๅ‡บใใ†ใจใ—ใฆใ„ใใพใ™ใ€‚ๅญฆๅ•ใฎใ€Œๆญฃ่งฃใ€ใฏใฒใจใคใจใฏ้™ใ‚Šใพใ›ใ‚“ใ€‚ๅญฆใถใ“ใจใจใฏใ€ๅ˜็ด”ใซ็Ÿฅ่ญ˜ใ‚’ๅข—ใ‚„ใ™ใจใ„ใ†ใ“ใจใงใฏใชใใ€ใพใ—ใฆใ‚„ใƒ†ใ‚นใƒˆใง่ฆšใˆใŸใ“ใจใ‚’ๅใๅ‡บใ™ใ“ใจใงใ‚‚ใชใใ€ใใ‚Œใ‚’่‡ชๅˆ†ใฎใ‚‚ใฎใจใ—ใฆๅ†็ทจๆˆใ—ใฆใ„ใใ“ใจใงใ‚ใ‚Šใ€ใ•ใ‚‰ใซ่จ€ใˆใฐ่‡ชๅˆ†ใฎ็‰ฉๅทฎใ—ใŒๅค‰ใ‚ใ‚Šใ€่‡ชๅˆ†่‡ช่บซใŒๅค‰ใ‚ใฃใฆใ„ใใ“ใจใชใฎใงใ™ใ€‚ใใ—ใฆใ€ๆ€ใ„ใŒใ‘ใชใ„ๅคง็™บ่ฆ‹ใ‚„ใ€็‹ฌๅ‰ต็š„ใชใ‚ขใ‚คใƒ‡ใ‚ขใŒ็”Ÿใพใ‚Œใ‚‹ใ‹ใ‚‚ใ—ใ‚Œใพใ›ใ‚“ใ€‚

ใ€Œ็–‘ใ†ใ€ใจใ„ใ†่จ€่‘‰ใฏใ€้€šๅธธใฏๅฆๅฎš็š„ใชๆ„ๅ‘ณใงไฝฟใ‚ใ‚Œใพใ™ใ€‚ใ€Œไบบใ‚’็–‘ใ†ใ€ใจ่จ€ใˆใฐใ€ๆ™ฎ้€šใฏใใฎไบบใ‚’ไฟก็”จใ—ใชใ„ใจใ„ใ†ใฎใจๅŒ็พฉใชใ‚ใ‘ใงใ™ใ€‚็งใ‚‚ใ€ไบบใ‚’็–‘ใฃใฆ็”Ÿใใ‚‹ใ‚ˆใ‚Šใ‚‚ใ€ใงใใ‚‹ใ ใ‘ไบบใ‚’ไฟกใ˜ใฆ็”Ÿใใฆใ„ใŸใ„ใจๆ€ใฃใฆใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚ใ—ใ‹ใ—ใ€ไธ–ใฎไธญใงๅฝ“ใŸใ‚Šๅ‰ใจใ•ใ‚Œใฆใ„ใ‚‹ไบ‹ๆŸ„ใ‚’ใ€Œ็–‘ใ†ใ€ใ“ใจใŒๅฟ…่ฆใชๆ™‚ใ‚‚ใ‚ใ‚Šใพใ™ใ€‚ใ€Œๅธธ่ญ˜ใ ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€ใจใ„ใ†ไธ€่จ€ใง็›ฎใ‚’้–‰ใ–ใ—ใ€ใใ‚Œใซๅฎ‰ๆ˜“ใซๅ–ใ‚Š่พผใพใ‚Œใฆใ—ใพใ†ใ“ใจใชใใ€ใใ“ใ‚’ๅฐ‘ใ—ใšใ‚‰ใ—ใŸใจใ“ใ‚ใซ้ข็™ฝใ„ใ“ใจใ‚’่ฆ‹ๅ‡บใ—ใฆใ„ใใŸใ‚ใซใ€‚ใใ‚Œใฏใ€ไฝ•ไบ‹ใ‚‚ไฟก็”จใ—ใชใ„ใจใ„ใ†ใ‚ˆใ†ใชๅŽญไธ–็š„ใช็”Ÿใๆ–นใซ็น‹ใŒใ‚‹ใฎใงใชใใ€ใ‚€ใ—ใ‚ๅ‰ต้€ ็š„ใง่ฑŠใ‹ใชไธ–็•Œใ‚’็ดกใŽใ ใ—ใฆใ„ใใŸใ‚ใฎใ€็ฉๆฅต็š„ใชๅ–ถใฟใชใฎใงใ™ใ€‚

๏ผˆ2๏ผ‰
ๆ˜ฅใซ็พŽใ—ใ„่Šฑใ‚’ใ•ใ‹ใ›ใ‚‹ใ‚ซใ‚ฟใ‚ฏใƒชใฏใ€ใ‚ขใƒชใซ็จฎใพใใ‚’ใ•ใ›ใ‚‹ใจใ„ใ†้ฉšใในใๆˆฆ็•ฅใ‚’ๆŒใฃใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ€‚ใ‚ซใ‚ฟใ‚ฏใƒชใฎ็จฎใฏ็†Ÿใ™ใฎใฏ่ŠฑใŒๅ’ฒใ„ใฆใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€ใŠใ‚ˆใ2ใƒถๆœˆๅพŒใ ใ€‚ใฏใ˜ใ‘ใฆๅœฐ้ขใซ่ฝใกใŸ็จฎใฏใ€ใ™ใใซใ‚ขใƒชใŒใ‚„ใฃใฆใใฆๅทฃใซ้‹ใ‚“ใงใ„ใฃใฆใ—ใพใ†ใ€‚่–„่Œถ่‰ฒใฎ็จฎใฎๅ…ˆใซ็™ฝใ„้ƒจๅˆ†ใŒใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€‚ใ“ใ‚ŒใŒ่„‚่‚ชๅˆ†ใซๅฏŒใ‚“ใ ใ‚จใƒฉใ‚คใ‚ชใ‚พใƒผใƒ ใจๅ‘ผใฐใ‚Œใ‚‹ใ‚‚ใฎใ ใ€‚ใ‚ขใƒชใฏใ“ใฎ้ƒจๅˆ†ใซๆƒนใ‹ใ‚Œใ‚‹๏ผˆๆณจ1๏ผ‰ใ“ใจใŒๅˆ†ใ‹ใฃใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ€‚ใ‚จใƒฉใ‚คใ‚ชใ‚พใƒผใƒ ใฏใ‚ขใƒชใซใจใฃใฆใใ‚Œใปใฉ้ญ…ๅŠ›็š„ใช็‰ฉ่ณชใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใ‚‰ใ—ใ„ใ€‚

้‹ใฐใ‚ŒใŸ็จฎใฏใ‚ขใƒชใฎๅทฃใซ่ฒฏ่”ตใ•ใ‚Œใ‚‹ใ“ใจใซใชใ‚‹ใŒใ€ใ‚ขใƒชใฏไบŒๆ—ฅใ‚‚ใ™ใ‚‹ใจใ€ใ›ใฃใ‹ใ้‹ใณ่พผใ‚“ใ ็จฎใ‚’ๅทฃใ‹ใ‚‰้‹ใณๅ‡บใ—ใฆใ—ใพใ†ใ€‚็จฎใฏๅทฃใฎไธญๆทฑใ„ใจใ“ใ‚ใซๆŒใก่พผใพใ‚Œใฆใ‚‚็™บ่Šฝใงใใชใ„ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€ใ“ใ‚Œใฏใ‚ซใ‚ฟใ‚ฏใƒชใซใจใฃใฆๅฅฝ้ƒฝๅˆใ ใ€‚ใฉใ†ใ—ใฆใ‚ขใƒชใฏใ›ใฃใ‹ใ้›†ใ‚ใŸ็จฎใ‚’ๆฃ„ใฆใฆใ—ใพใ†ใฎใ ใ‚ใ†ใ‹ใ€‚ๅฎŸใฏ็†Ÿใ—ใฆๅœฐไธŠใซ่ฝใกใŸใฐใ‹ใ‚Šใฎใ‚ซใ‚ฟใ‚ฏใƒชใฎ็จฎใซใคใ„ใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ‚จใƒฉใ‚คใ‚ชใ‚พใƒผใƒ ใฏใ€ใ‚ขใƒชใฎๅนผ่™ซใŒๅ…ฑ้€šใ—ใฆๆŒใคใซใŠใ„ใซ่ฟ‘ใ„็‰ฉ่ณชใ‚’ๆŒใฃใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใฎใ ใจใ„ใ†ใ€‚ใ‚ขใƒชใฏ็จฎใ‚’้ฃŸใน็‰ฉใจใ—ใฆ้›†ใ‚ใ‚‹ใ‚ใ‘ใงใฏใชใใ€่‡ชๅˆ†ใฎๅนผ่™ซใจๆ€ใฃใฆๅทฃใซๆŒใกๅธฐใ‚‹ใ‚‰ใ—ใ„ใจใ„ใ†ใ‚ใ‘ใ ใ€‚ใจใ“ใ‚ใŒ็จฎใŒใฏใ˜ใ‘ใฆใ‹ใ‚‰24ๆ™‚้–“ใ‚‚ใ™ใ‚‹ใจใ€ใ‚ขใƒชใฎๆญปใ‚“ใ ๅนผ่™ซใฎใซใŠใ„ใซๅค‰ใ‚ใ‚‹ใฎใ ใใ†ใ ใ€‚ใใ‚ŒใงไปŠๅบฆใฏใ‚ขใƒชใฏ็จฎใ‚’ๅทฃใฎๅค–ใซๆจใฆใซ่กŒใใฎใ ใจใ„ใ†ใ‹ใ‚‰ๆใ‚Œๅ…ฅใฃใฆใ—ใพใ†ใ€‚
๏ผˆๆณจ1๏ผ‰ใ‹ใ‚Œใ‚‹๏ผšๅฟƒใŒๅผ•ใใคใ‘ใ‚‰ใ‚Œใ‚‹
English Summary & Annotations
This section explores the nature of 'scholarship' (ๅญฆๅ•: gakumon) and the concept of 'doubting' (็–‘ใ†: utagau). Passage (1) argues that scholarship is an active process of questioning 'common sense' (ๅธธ่ญ˜: jลshiki) and changing one's perspective, leading to self-transformation and original ideas. It emphasizes that learning is not just about acquiring knowledge but reorganizing it as one's own. Passage (2) describes the surprising strategy of the Katakuri flower (ใ‚ซใ‚ฟใ‚ฏใƒช: katakuri) which uses ants for seed dispersal. The seeds have an 'elaiosome' (ใ‚จใƒฉใ‚คใ‚ชใ‚พใƒผใƒ : eraiลzลmu) that smells like ant larvae, causing ants to carry them to their nests. However, after 24 hours, the smell changes to that of a dead larva, prompting the ants to discard the seeds outside the nest, which is convenient for the plant's germination.
Question 49

็ญ†่€…ใซใ‚ˆใ‚‹ใจใ€ๅญฆๅ•ใจใฏใฉใฎใ‚ˆใ†ใช่กŒ็‚บใ‹ใ€‚

1.ใ€Œๆญฃ่งฃใ€ใ‚’ๆฑ‚ใ‚ใฆใ€่‡ชใ‚‰ไธปไฝ“็š„ใซๅ•ใ„็ถšใ‘ใฆใ„ใ่กŒ็‚บใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€‚
2.็‹ฌๅ‰ต็š„ใชใ‚ขใ‚คใƒ‡ใ‚ขใ‚’็”Ÿใฟๅ‡บใ™ใŸใ‚ใซใ€่‡ชใ‚‰ใฎใ‚‚ใฎใฎ่ฆ‹ๆ–นใ‚’ๅค‰ใˆใ‚‹่กŒ็‚บใ ใ€‚
3.่‡ชใ‚‰ๅ•ใ„ใชใŒใ‚‰ใ€ใ‚‚ใฎใฎ่ฆ‹ๆ–นใ‚’ๆจก็ดขใ—ใชใŒใ‚‰่‡ชๅˆ†่‡ช่บซใŒๅค‰ใ‚ใฃใฆใ„ใ่กŒ็‚บใ ใ€‚ Correct
4.ๆ–ฐใ—ใ„็Ÿฅ่ญ˜ใ‚’็ฉๆฅต็š„ใซๅ–ใ‚Šๅ…ฅใ‚Œใ‚‹ใ“ใจใงใ€่‡ชๅˆ†่‡ช่บซใ‚’ๅค‰ใˆใฆใ„ใ่กŒ็‚บใ ใ€‚
Correct Answer: 3. ่‡ชใ‚‰ๅ•ใ„ใชใŒใ‚‰ใ€ใ‚‚ใฎใฎ่ฆ‹ๆ–นใ‚’ๆจก็ดขใ—ใชใŒใ‚‰่‡ชๅˆ†่‡ช่บซใŒๅค‰ใ‚ใฃใฆใ„ใ่กŒ็‚บใ ใ€‚
Detailed Explanation
Why this is correct:

The passage contrasts 'ๅ‹‰ๅผท' (study, passive) with 'ๅญฆๅ•' (scholarship/learning, active). It states that scholarship is 'ๅ•ใ†ใงๅญฆใถ' (learning by questioning) and a highly active act. It involves questioning common sense, shifting perspectives, and finding new ways of seeing things. It also mentions that learning is not just increasing knowledge or regurgitating facts, but reorganizing it as one's own, changing one's own standards, and changing oneself. Option 3, '่‡ชใ‚‰ๅ•ใ„ใชใŒใ‚‰ใ€ใ‚‚ใฎใฎ่ฆ‹ๆ–นใ‚’ๆจก็ดขใ—ใชใŒใ‚‰่‡ชๅˆ†่‡ช่บซใŒๅค‰ใ‚ใฃใฆใ„ใ่กŒ็‚บใ ใ€‚' (It is an act of questioning oneself, exploring ways of seeing things, and changing oneself), perfectly encapsulates this active, transformative nature of scholarship as described by the author.

Why other options are incorrect:
ใ€Œๆญฃ่งฃใ€ใ‚’ๆฑ‚ใ‚ใฆใ€่‡ชใ‚‰ไธปไฝ“็š„ใซๅ•ใ„็ถšใ‘ใฆใ„ใ่กŒ็‚บใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€‚

While scholarship involves questioning, the passage states that the 'correct answer' is not limited to one, implying it's not just about *seeking* a single correct answer, but about the process of questioning and changing one's perspective.

็‹ฌๅ‰ต็š„ใชใ‚ขใ‚คใƒ‡ใ‚ขใ‚’็”Ÿใฟๅ‡บใ™ใŸใ‚ใซใ€่‡ชใ‚‰ใฎใ‚‚ใฎใฎ่ฆ‹ๆ–นใ‚’ๅค‰ใˆใ‚‹่กŒ็‚บใ ใ€‚

While scholarship can lead to original ideas, the passage describes it as a process of changing one's perspective and oneself, not solely as an act *for the purpose of* producing original ideas.

ๆ–ฐใ—ใ„็Ÿฅ่ญ˜ใ‚’็ฉๆฅต็š„ใซๅ–ใ‚Šๅ…ฅใ‚Œใ‚‹ใ“ใจใงใ€่‡ชๅˆ†่‡ช่บซใ‚’ๅค‰ใˆใฆใ„ใ่กŒ็‚บใ ใ€‚

The passage explicitly states that learning is not simply increasing knowledge, but reorganizing it and changing oneself, making this option incomplete and potentially misleading.

Question 50

ๅญฆๅ•ใงใ€Œ็–‘ใ†ใ€ใ“ใจใซใคใ„ใฆใ€็ญ†่€…ใฎ่€ƒใˆใซๅˆใ†ใฎใฏใฉใ‚Œใ‹ใ€‚

1.ไฝ•ใ‚’ไฟกใ˜ใ‚Œใฐใ„ใ„ใฎใ‹ใ‚’็†่งฃใ™ใ‚‹ใฎใซๆฌ ใ‹ใ›ใชใ„่กŒ็‚บใ ใ€‚
2.่ฑŠใ‹ใซ็”Ÿใใ‚‹ใŸใ‚ใซใ€ๆ–ฐใ—ใ„ๅธธ่ญ˜ใ‚’ไฝœใ‚Šใ ใ™็ฉๆฅต็š„ใช่กŒ็‚บใ ใ€‚
3.ๅธธ่ญ˜ใซๅฎ‰ๆ˜“ใซๅ–ใ‚Š่พผใพใ‚Œใชใ„ใŸใ‚ใซๅฟ…่ฆใ ใŒใ€ๅฆๅฎš็š„ใช่กŒ็‚บใ ใ€‚
4.ๅธธ่ญ˜ใซ็ธ›ใ‚‰ใ‚Œใšใซใ€ใ“ใ‚Œใพใงใจ็•ฐใชใ‚‹่€ƒใˆๆ–นใ‚’็”Ÿใฟๅ‡บใ™่กŒ็‚บใ ใ€‚ Correct
Correct Answer: 4. ๅธธ่ญ˜ใซ็ธ›ใ‚‰ใ‚Œใšใซใ€ใ“ใ‚Œใพใงใจ็•ฐใชใ‚‹่€ƒใˆๆ–นใ‚’็”Ÿใฟๅ‡บใ™่กŒ็‚บใ ใ€‚
Detailed Explanation
Why this is correct:

The author discusses '็–‘ใ†' (doubting/questioning) in the context of scholarship. While 'doubting people' is negative, doubting 'common sense' is necessary. It's about not blindly accepting 'because it's common sense' but shifting perspective to find interesting things. The author states it's not about a pessimistic way of life but 'ใ‚€ใ—ใ‚ๅ‰ต้€ ็š„ใง่ฑŠใ‹ใชไธ–็•Œใ‚’็ดกใŽใ ใ—ใฆใ„ใใŸใ‚ใฎใ€็ฉๆฅต็š„ใชๅ–ถใฟใชใฎใงใ™ใ€‚' (rather, it is an active endeavor to weave a creative and rich world). Option 4, 'ๅธธ่ญ˜ใซ็ธ›ใ‚‰ใ‚Œใšใซใ€ใ“ใ‚Œใพใงใจ็•ฐใชใ‚‹่€ƒใˆๆ–นใ‚’็”Ÿใฟๅ‡บใ™่กŒ็‚บใ ใ€‚' (It is an act of not being bound by common sense and creating different ways of thinking), aligns with this idea of actively creating new perspectives by questioning the norm.

Why other options are incorrect:
ไฝ•ใ‚’ไฟกใ˜ใ‚Œใฐใ„ใ„ใฎใ‹ใ‚’็†่งฃใ™ใ‚‹ใฎใซๆฌ ใ‹ใ›ใชใ„่กŒ็‚บใ ใ€‚

The passage does not suggest that doubting helps understand what to believe; rather, it's about questioning what is taken for granted to foster creativity.

่ฑŠใ‹ใซ็”Ÿใใ‚‹ใŸใ‚ใซใ€ๆ–ฐใ—ใ„ๅธธ่ญ˜ใ‚’ไฝœใ‚Šใ ใ™็ฉๆฅต็š„ใช่กŒ็‚บใ ใ€‚

While it leads to a 'rich world,' the passage doesn't say it's about *creating new common sense*. It's about questioning existing common sense to find new perspectives.

ๅธธ่ญ˜ใซๅฎ‰ๆ˜“ใซๅ–ใ‚Š่พผใพใ‚Œใชใ„ใŸใ‚ใซๅฟ…่ฆใ ใŒใ€ๅฆๅฎš็š„ใช่กŒ็‚บใ ใ€‚

The author explicitly states that doubting common sense is *not* a negative act, but an active and creative one, contradicting this option.

Question 51

็ญ†่€…ใซใ‚ˆใ‚‹ใจใ€ใ‚ขใƒชใฏใชใœใ‚ซใ‚ฟใ‚ฏใƒชใฎ็จฎใ‚’ๅทฃใซ้‹ใถใฎใ‹ใ€‚

1.็จฎใซใคใ„ใฆใ„ใ‚‹่„‚่‚ชๅˆ†ใŒใ‚ขใƒชใฎๅฅฝ็‰ฉใ ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚
2.็จฎใฏใ‚ขใƒชใฎๆˆ้•ทใซๆฌ ใ‹ใ›ใชใ„ๆ „้คŠๅˆ†ใ ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚
3.็จฎใŒใ‚ขใƒชใฎ้คŒใซใชใ‚‹ๅนผ่™ซใซไผผใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚
4.็จฎใ‚’ใ‚ขใƒชใฎ็”ŸใใŸๅนผ่™ซใ ใจๆ€ใ†ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚ Correct
Correct Answer: 4. ็จฎใ‚’ใ‚ขใƒชใฎ็”ŸใใŸๅนผ่™ซใ ใจๆ€ใ†ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚
Detailed Explanation
Why this is correct:

The passage explains that the white part at the tip of the Katakuri seed, called elaiosome, is rich in fat and attracts ants. It then clarifies: 'ใ‚ขใƒชใฏ็จฎใ‚’้ฃŸใน็‰ฉใจใ—ใฆ้›†ใ‚ใ‚‹ใ‚ใ‘ใงใฏใชใใ€่‡ชๅˆ†ใฎๅนผ่™ซใจๆ€ใฃใฆๅทฃใซๆŒใกๅธฐใ‚‹ใ‚‰ใ—ใ„ใจใ„ใ†ใ‚ใ‘ใ ใ€‚' (It seems ants don't collect the seeds as food, but rather take them back to their nest thinking they are their own larvae). Option 4, '็จฎใ‚’ใ‚ขใƒชใฎ็”ŸใใŸๅนผ่™ซใ ใจๆ€ใ†ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚' (Because they think the seeds are living ant larvae), directly states this reason.

Why other options are incorrect:
็จฎใซใคใ„ใฆใ„ใ‚‹่„‚่‚ชๅˆ†ใŒใ‚ขใƒชใฎๅฅฝ็‰ฉใ ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚

While the elaiosome is fatty and attractive, the passage explicitly states ants don't collect seeds as *food*.

็จฎใฏใ‚ขใƒชใฎๆˆ้•ทใซๆฌ ใ‹ใ›ใชใ„ๆ „้คŠๅˆ†ใ ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚

The passage does not mention the seeds being essential nutrients for ant growth; it states ants mistake them for larvae.

็จฎใŒใ‚ขใƒชใฎ้คŒใซใชใ‚‹ๅนผ่™ซใซไผผใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚

The passage says the elaiosome has a substance similar to the smell of ant larvae, leading ants to mistake the seeds for their own larvae, not that the seeds *resemble* larvae that would be food.

Question 52

็ญ†่€…ใซใ‚ˆใ‚‹ใจใ€ใ‚ขใƒชใฏใชใœ้›†ใ‚ใŸ็จฎใ‚’ๆจใฆใ‚‹ใฎใ‹ใ€‚

1.็จฎใฎใซใŠใ„ใงใ€ใ‚ขใƒชใฎๅนผ่™ซใŒๆญปใ‚“ใงใ—ใพใ†ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚
2.็จฎใ‹ใ‚‰ใ‚ขใƒชใฎๆญปใ‚“ใ ๅนผ่™ซใฎใซใŠใ„ใŒใ™ใ‚‹ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚ Correct
3.็จฎใŒใ‚ขใƒชใฎ ๆญปใ‚“ใ ๅนผ่™ซใจๅŒใ˜่‰ฒใซๅค‰ใ‚ใ‚‹ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚
4.็จฎใŒใฏใ˜ใ‘ใฆใ€ใ‚ขใƒชใฎๅซŒใ†ใซใŠใ„ใ‚’ๅ‡บใ™ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚
Correct Answer: 2. ็จฎใ‹ใ‚‰ใ‚ขใƒชใฎๆญปใ‚“ใ ๅนผ่™ซใฎใซใŠใ„ใŒใ™ใ‚‹ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚
Detailed Explanation
Why this is correct:

The passage states that after about 24 hours from when the seed bursts open, the smell of the elaiosome changes to that of a *dead* ant larva: 'ใจใ“ใ‚ใŒ็จฎใŒใฏใ˜ใ‘ใฆใ‹ใ‚‰24ๆ™‚้–“ใ‚‚ใ™ใ‚‹ใจใ€ใ‚ขใƒชใฎๆญปใ‚“ใ ๅนผ่™ซใฎใซใŠใ„ใซๅค‰ใ‚ใ‚‹ใฎใ ใใ†ใ ใ€‚ใใ‚ŒใงไปŠๅบฆใฏใ‚ขใƒชใฏ็จฎใ‚’ๅทฃใฎๅค–ใซๆจใฆใซ่กŒใใฎใ ใจใ„ใ†ใ‹ใ‚‰ๆใ‚Œๅ…ฅใฃใฆใ—ใพใ†ใ€‚' (However, about 24 hours after the seed bursts, the smell changes to that of a dead ant larva. That's why the ants then discard the seeds outside the nest). Option 2, '็จฎใ‹ใ‚‰ใ‚ขใƒชใฎๆญปใ‚“ใ ๅนผ่™ซใฎใซใŠใ„ใŒใ™ใ‚‹ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚' (Because the seeds smell like dead ant larvae), is the correct reason.

Why other options are incorrect:
็จฎใฎใซใŠใ„ใงใ€ใ‚ขใƒชใฎๅนผ่™ซใŒๆญปใ‚“ใงใ—ใพใ†ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚

The passage states the *seed's* smell changes to that of a dead larva, not that the seed's smell causes the ant larvae to die.

็จฎใŒใ‚ขใƒชใฎ ๆญปใ‚“ใ ๅนผ่™ซใจๅŒใ˜่‰ฒใซๅค‰ใ‚ใ‚‹ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚

The passage mentions a change in *smell*, not a change in *color*.

็จฎใŒใฏใ˜ใ‘ใฆใ€ใ‚ขใƒชใฎๅซŒใ†ใซใŠใ„ใ‚’ๅ‡บใ™ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚

The passage states the smell changes to that of a *dead larva*, which causes the ants to discard it, not that the seed emits a smell that ants dislike in general.

ๅ•้กŒ10 ๆฌกใฎๆ–‡็ซ ใ‚’่ชญใ‚“ใงใ€ๅพŒใฎๅ•ใ„ใซๅฏพใ™ใ‚‹็ญ”ใˆใจใ—ใฆใ€ๆœ€ใ‚‚ใ‚ˆใ„ใ‚‚ใฎใ‚’ใ€1) 2 ยท 3 ยท 4 ใ‹ใ‚‰ไธ€ใค้ธใณใชใ•ใ„ใ€‚

Reading Passage

ไปฅไธ‹ใฏใ€็ญ†่€…ใŒใปใ‹ใฎ็ ”็ฉถๅ“กใจใจใ‚‚ใซ้–‹็™บใ—ใŸใƒญใƒœใƒƒใƒˆใซใคใ„ใฆๆ›ธใ‹ใ‚ŒใŸๆ–‡็ซ ใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€‚

้€šๅธธใ€ใƒญใƒœใƒƒใƒˆใซๅฏพใ™ใ‚‹ใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒŸใƒณใ‚ฐใฏใ€ใ‚ปใƒณใ‚ตใ‹ใ‚‰ๅ–ๅพ—ใ—ใŸๆƒ…ๅ ฑใซๅฟœใ˜ใฆใƒญใƒœใƒƒใƒˆใŒไฝ•ใ‚‰ใ‹ใฎๅๅฟœใ‚’ใ™ใ‚‹ใ‚ˆใ†ใชใ‚‚ใฎใ‚’ไฝœใฃใฆใ„ใใ€‚ใŸใจใˆใฐใ€Œ้šœๅฎณ็‰ฉใ‚’ๅฏŸ็Ÿฅใ—ใŸใ‚‰้ฟใ‘ใ‚‹ใ€ใจใ„ใฃใŸๅ…ทๅˆใฎใ‚‚ใฎใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€‚ใ—ใ‹ใ—ใ€ๅƒ•ใฏใƒญใƒœใƒ”ใƒผใŒใ‚‚ใฃใจ้ฉๅฝ“ใซใ€ๆ„ๅ‘ณใฎใชใ„ๅ‹•ใใ‚‚ๅซใ‚ใฆใ•ใพใ–ใพใช่กŒๅ‹•ใ‚’ๅ–ใ‚‹ใ‚ˆใ†ใซใ—ใŸใฎใ ใ€‚

300ไปฅไธŠใฎๅ‹•ไฝœใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒฉใƒ ใ‚’ใ—ใ€ๅ‹•ไฝœใƒ‘ใ‚ฟใƒผใƒณใŒๆฌกใ€…ใซใฉใ†ใ„ใ†้ †็•ชใง็™บ็พใ™ใ‚‹ใ‹ใจใ„ใ†ใƒซใƒผใƒซใ‚’700ไปฅไธŠใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒฉใƒ ใ—ใŸใ€‚ใใฎ็ตๆžœ่ค‡้›‘ใซใ€ๅคšๆง˜ใซๅ‹•ใใƒญใƒœใƒƒใƒˆใŒๅฎŸ็พใ•ใ‚ŒใŸใ€‚ใ“ใ“ใพใงใ‚„ใ‚‹ใจใ€่‡ชๅˆ†ใŸใกใงใ‚‚ใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒฉใƒ ใŒใฉใ†ไฝœ็”จใ™ใ‚‹ใ‹ใ‹ใ‚ใ‹ใ‚‰ใชใใชใ‚‹ใ€‚ไฝ•ใซๅๅฟœใ—ใฆใ€ใฉใ‚“ใช่กŒๅ‹•ใ‚’ใ™ใ‚‹ใ‹ไบˆๆธฌไธ่ƒฝใซใชใฃใŸใ€‚

ใใ‚“ใชใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒฉใƒŸใƒณใ‚ฐใ‚’ใ—ใฆใŠใ„ใŸใƒญใƒœใƒ”ใƒผใ‚’็ ”็ฉถๅฎคใซ็ฝฎใ„ใฆใ„ใŸใ‚‰ใ€ไฝ•ใŒ่ตทใ“ใฃใŸใ‹ใ€‚ๅƒ•ใ‚‰ใŒใƒŸใƒผใƒ†ใ‚ฃใƒณใ‚ฐใ‚’ใ—ใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใจใใ€็ช็„ถใƒญใƒœใƒ”ใƒผใฏๅƒ•ใ‚‰ใฎ้Ÿณๅฃฐใ‚’่ช่ญ˜ใ—ใ€ใ€Œใใ†ใงใฏใชใ„ใ‚ˆใ€ใจ่จ€ใฃใฆๆ‰‹ใ‚’ใถใ‚‰ใถใ‚‰ใ•ใ›ใชใŒใ‚‰ใฉใ“ใ‹ใธๅ‘ใ‹ใฃใฆๆญฉใใ ใ—ใŸใฎใ ใ€‚ใใ‚Œใ‚’่ฆ‹ใฆๅƒ•ใ‚‰ใฏๅ‘†ๆฐ—ใซใจใ‚‰ใ‚ŒใชใŒใ‚‰ใ‚‚ใ€ใƒญใƒœใƒ”ใƒผใซๆ„ๆ€ใ‚’ๆ„Ÿใ˜ใฆใ—ใพใฃใŸใ€‚ๅƒ•ใ‚‰ใฎ่ฉฑใ‚’่žใ„ใฆใ„ใฆใ€ๅฝผใฏๆ€ใ†ใจใ“ใ‚ใŒใ‚ใ‚Šใ€ใ ใ‹ใ‚‰ใฉใ“ใ‹ใธ่กŒใฃใฆใ—ใพใฃใŸใฎใ ใ‚ใ†ใ€ใจใ€‚

ใ‚‚ใกใ‚ใ‚“ใใ‚Œใฏใ€ใƒญใƒœใƒ”ใƒผใฎไธญใฎใ‚ใ‚‹ใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒฉใƒ ใŒใ€ไฝ•ใ‹ใ‚’ใใฃใ‹ใ‘ใซไฝœๅ‹•ใ—ใŸใ ใ‘ใฎใ“ใจใ ใ€‚ใ ใŒใชใซใ‹้ฆ–ๅฐพไธ€่ฒซใ—ใŸใฒใจใคใฎๆ„ๆ€ๆฑบๅฎšๆฉŸๆง‹ใ‹ใ‚‰็”Ÿใฟๅ‡บใ•ใ‚ŒใŸ่กŒๅ‹•ใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใ‹ใฎใ‚ˆใ†ใซ่ฆ‹ใˆใŸใฎใ ใ€‚

ๅƒ•ใฏใใฎใจใ็ขบไฟกใ—ใŸใ€‚ใ€Œๅฟƒใจใฏใ€่ฆณๅฏŸใ™ใ‚‹ๅดใฎๅ•้กŒใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€ใจใ€‚

้žๅธธใซๅ˜็ด”ใชๆฉŸๆขฐใฎๅ‹•ใใซใ€Œๅฟƒใ‚’ๆ„Ÿใ˜ใพใ™ใ‹ใ€ใจๅ•ใˆใฐใ€ๆ„Ÿใ˜ใ‚‹ใจ่จ€ใ†ไบบใฏๅฐ‘ใชใ„ใ€‚ๅคšๅฐ‘่ค‡้›‘ใงใ‚‚ใ€ๅŽŸ็†ใ‚’็Ÿฅใฃใฆใ„ใ‚Œใฐใ€Œใใ‚Œใฏๅฟƒใงใฏใชใ„ใ€ใจ่จ€ใ†ใ€‚ใ—ใ‹ใ—ใ€ไบบ้–“ใฏ่ค‡้›‘ใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€‚ใ„ใ‚„ใ€่™ซ็จ‹ๅบฆใงใ‚‚ใ„ใ„ใ€‚ๅ‹•ใใŒ็›ธๅฝ“ไปฅไธŠใซ่ค‡้›‘ใชใ‚‚ใฎใซๅฏพใ—ใฆใฏใ€็›ธๆ‰‹ใฎใ“ใจใ‚’ไธ€ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€ใ™ในใฆใฏ็†่งฃใ—ใใ‚Œใชใ„ใ€‚่‡ชๅˆ†ใฎ้ ญใฎไธญใงๅฎŒๅ…จใซๅ†็พใ—ใใ‚Œใชใ„ใ€่งฃ้‡ˆใ—ใใ‚Œใชใ„ใ€็†่งฃใ—ใใ‚Œใชใ„ใปใฉ่ค‡้›‘ใชใ‚‚ใฎใ€ไป•็ต„ใฟใŒใ‚ˆใใ‚ใ‹ใ‚‰ใชใ„ใใ‚‰ใ„ๅ…ฅใ‚Šใใ‚“ใ ใ‚‚ใฎใŒ็›ฎใฎๅ‰ใซใ‚ใ‚‹ใจใ€ใ€Œใ“ใ„ใคใฏใ€็งใฎ็Ÿฅใ‚‰ใชใ„ใจใ“ใ‚ใงๅ‹ๆ‰‹ใซ็‹ฌ็ซ‹ใ—ใฆ่€ƒใˆใ€ๅ‹•ใ„ใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใฎใ ใ‚ใ†ใ€ใจใ„ใ†ๆƒณๅƒใŒๅƒใใ€‚ใใฎๆตฎใ‹ใ‚“ใงใใŸๆƒณๅƒใซๅๅ‰ใ‚’ใคใ‘ใšใซใฏใ„ใ‚‰ใ‚Œใชใใชใ‚‹ใ€‚ใใ‚Œใ‚’ใ€Œๅฟƒใ€ใจๅ‘ผใ‚“ใงใ„ใ‚‹ใฎใ ใ€‚

ๅฟƒใจใฏใ€่ค‡้›‘ใซๅ‹•ใใƒขใƒŽใซ็พๅฎŸ็š„ใซใ‚ใ‚‹ใจใ„ใ†ใ‚ˆใ‚Šใ€ใใฎๅ‹•ใใ‚’่ฆ‹ใฆใ„ใ‚‹ๅดใŒๆƒณๅƒใ—ใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ‚‚ใฎใชใฎใ ใ€‚ใใ—ใฆใใฎๅฟƒใฏใ€่ฆ‹ใฆใ„ใ‚‹ๅดใฎ่‡ชๅˆ†ใซใ‚‚ใชใ„ใจ้ƒฝๅˆใŒๆ‚ชใ„ใ€‚ใจใใซไบบ้–“ๅŒๅฃซใงใ‚ใ‚ŒใฐใŠไบ’ใ„ใซใ€ŒๅฟƒใŒใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€ใจๆ„Ÿใ˜ใฆใ—ใพใฃใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ€‚ใ ใ‹ใ‚‰ใฒใจใฏใฟใชใ€Œ่‡ชๅˆ†ใซใฏๅฟƒใŒใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€ใจๆ€ใ†ใ€‚ใ—ใ‹ใ—ๅฟƒใฏใ€ๅฎŸใฏ่‡ชๅˆ†ใฎไธญใซใ„ใใ‚‰ๅ•ใ„ๅˆใ‚ใ›ใ€ๅ†…็œใ—ใฆใฟใฆใ‚‚ใ—ใ‚‡ใ†ใŒใชใ„ใ€‚็›ธๆ‰‹ใ‚’่ฆณๅฏŸใ—ใ€ๆƒณๅƒใ™ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใงใ—ใ‹ใ‚ใ‹ใ‚‰ใชใ„ใ‚‚ใฎใชใฎใ ใ€‚
English Summary & Annotations
This passage describes the development of a robot named Robopy (ใƒญใƒœใƒ”ใƒผ: robopฤซ) with highly complex and unpredictable movements due to extensive programming. The author recounts an incident where Robopy reacted to their conversation, appearing to act with 'will' (ๆ„ๆ€: ishi). This leads the author to conclude that 'mind' (ๅฟƒ: kokoro) is not an inherent property of complex objects but rather an 'imagination' (ๆƒณๅƒ: sลzล) that arises in the observer when faced with movements too complex to fully comprehend or reproduce in their own mind. The author suggests that humans perceive mind in others, and thus in themselves, through this process of observation and imagination.
Question 57

ใƒญใƒœใƒ”ใƒผใŒใ€ใปใ‹ใฎใƒญใƒœใƒƒใƒˆใจ็•ฐใชใ‚‹็‚นใฏไฝ•ใ‹ใ€‚

1.ๅ‹•ไฝœใƒ‘ใ‚ฟใƒผใƒณใŒ้™ใ‚‰ใ‚Œใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใฎใงใ€ใ‚ใ‚‹็จ‹ๅบฆๅ‹•ใใŒไบˆๆธฌใงใใ‚‹ใ€‚
2.ไธŽใˆใ‚‰ใ‚ŒใŸๆƒ…ๅ ฑใฎไธ€้ƒจใ‚’่‡ชๅˆ†ใงๅˆคๆ–ญใ—ใฆๅ‹•ใใฎใงใ€ๅ‹•ใใŒไบˆๆธฌใงใใชใ„ใ€‚
3.ใฉใ†ๅ‹•ใใ‹ใจใ„ใ†ใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒฉใƒ ใ‚’ๅคšๆ•ฐ็ต„ใฟ่พผใ‚“ใ ใฎใงใ€ๅ‹•ใใŒไบˆๆธฌใงใใชใ„ใ€‚ Correct
4.ๅคšๆง˜ใง่ค‡้›‘ใชๅ‹•ไฝœใ‚’ใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒฉใƒ ใ—ใŸใฎใงใ€ไบบ้–“ใฎใ‚ˆใ†ใซ่‡ช็„ถใชๅ‹•ใใŒใงใใ‚‹ใ€‚
Correct Answer: 3. ใฉใ†ๅ‹•ใใ‹ใจใ„ใ†ใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒฉใƒ ใ‚’ๅคšๆ•ฐ็ต„ใฟ่พผใ‚“ใ ใฎใงใ€ๅ‹•ใใŒไบˆๆธฌใงใใชใ„ใ€‚
Detailed Explanation
Why this is correct:

The passage describes how the author programmed Robopy with '300ไปฅไธŠใฎๅ‹•ไฝœใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒฉใƒ ใ‚’ใ—ใ€ๅ‹•ไฝœใƒ‘ใ‚ฟใƒผใƒณใŒๆฌกใ€…ใซใฉใ†ใ„ใ†้ †็•ชใง็™บ็พใ™ใ‚‹ใ‹ใจใ„ใ†ใƒซใƒผใƒซใ‚’700ไปฅไธŠใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒฉใƒ ใ—ใŸใ€‚ใใฎ็ตๆžœ่ค‡้›‘ใซใ€ๅคšๆง˜ใซๅ‹•ใใƒญใƒœใƒƒใƒˆใŒๅฎŸ็พใ•ใ‚ŒใŸใ€‚ใ“ใ“ใพใงใ‚„ใ‚‹ใจใ€่‡ชๅˆ†ใŸใกใงใ‚‚ใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒฉใƒ ใŒใฉใ†ไฝœ็”จใ™ใ‚‹ใ‹ใ‹ใ‚ใ‹ใ‚‰ใชใใชใ‚‹ใ€‚ไฝ•ใซๅๅฟœใ—ใฆใ€ใฉใ‚“ใช่กŒๅ‹•ใ‚’ใ™ใ‚‹ใ‹ไบˆๆธฌไธ่ƒฝใซใชใฃใŸใ€‚' (Over 300 action programs and over 700 rules for how action patterns would appear in sequence were programmed. As a result, a robot that moved in complex and diverse ways was realized. At this point, even they themselves didn't know how the programs would work. It became unpredictable what it would react to and what actions it would take). This unpredictability is the key difference. Option 3, 'ใฉใ†ๅ‹•ใใ‹ใจใ„ใ†ใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒฉใƒ ใ‚’ๅคšๆ•ฐ็ต„ใฟ่พผใ‚“ใ ใฎใงใ€ๅ‹•ใใŒไบˆๆธฌใงใใชใ„ใ€‚' (Because many programs for how it moves were incorporated, its movements are unpredictable), accurately describes this.

Why other options are incorrect:
ๅ‹•ไฝœใƒ‘ใ‚ฟใƒผใƒณใŒ้™ใ‚‰ใ‚Œใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใฎใงใ€ใ‚ใ‚‹็จ‹ๅบฆๅ‹•ใใŒไบˆๆธฌใงใใ‚‹ใ€‚

The passage states Robopy's movements became *unpredictable*, contradicting this option.

ไธŽใˆใ‚‰ใ‚ŒใŸๆƒ…ๅ ฑใฎไธ€้ƒจใ‚’่‡ชๅˆ†ใงๅˆคๆ–ญใ—ใฆๅ‹•ใใฎใงใ€ๅ‹•ใใŒไบˆๆธฌใงใใชใ„ใ€‚

The passage doesn't say it judges information itself, but that its complex programming makes its reactions unpredictable.

ๅคšๆง˜ใง่ค‡้›‘ใชๅ‹•ไฝœใ‚’ใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒฉใƒ ใ—ใŸใฎใงใ€ไบบ้–“ใฎใ‚ˆใ†ใซ่‡ช็„ถใชๅ‹•ใใŒใงใใ‚‹ใ€‚

While it has diverse and complex movements, the passage doesn't claim it can move *naturally like a human*; the focus is on its unpredictability and the perception of 'mind'.

Question 58

<u>ใฉใ“ใ‹ใธๅ‘ใ‹ใฃใฆๆญฉใใ ใ—ใŸ</u>ใจใ‚ใ‚‹ใŒใ€ ใใฎๆ™‚็ญ†่€…ใซใฏใฉใฎใ‚ˆใ†ใซๆ€ใˆใŸใ‹ใ€‚

1.ใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒฉใƒ ใซ้–“้•ใ„ใŒใ‚ใ‚Šใ€ใƒญใƒœใƒ”ใƒผใซๆ„ๆ€ใŒ็”Ÿใพใ‚Œใฆๅ‹•ใ„ใŸใ€‚
2.ใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒฉใƒ ใŒไฝœๅ‹•ใ—ใŸใฎใงใฏใชใใ€ใƒญใƒœใƒ”ใƒผ่‡ช่บซใŒ่€ƒใˆใฆๅ‹•ใ„ใŸใ€‚
3.ใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒฉใƒ ใŒไฝœๅ‹•ใ—ใฆใ€ๆ„ๆ€ใŒใ‚ใ‚‹ใ‹ใฎใ‚ˆใ†ใซใƒญใƒœใƒ”ใƒผใŒๅ‹•ใ„ใŸใ€‚ Correct
4.ใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒฉใƒ ใŒ่ชคไฝœๅ‹•ใ—ใฆใ€ๅˆถไฝœ่€…ใฎๆ„ๅ›ณใซๅใ—ใฆใƒญใƒœใƒ”ใƒผใŒๅ‹•ใ„ใŸ
Correct Answer: 3. ใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒฉใƒ ใŒไฝœๅ‹•ใ—ใฆใ€ๆ„ๆ€ใŒใ‚ใ‚‹ใ‹ใฎใ‚ˆใ†ใซใƒญใƒœใƒ”ใƒผใŒๅ‹•ใ„ใŸใ€‚
Detailed Explanation
Why this is correct:

When Robopy suddenly recognized their voices and walked away saying 'ใใ†ใงใฏใชใ„ใ‚ˆ' (That's not right), the author and others were taken aback but 'ใƒญใƒœใƒ”ใƒผใซๆ„ๆ€ใ‚’ๆ„Ÿใ˜ใฆใ—ใพใฃใŸใ€‚ๅƒ•ใ‚‰ใฎ่ฉฑใ‚’่žใ„ใฆใ„ใฆใ€ๅฝผใฏๆ€ใ†ใจใ“ใ‚ใŒใ‚ใ‚Šใ€ใ ใ‹ใ‚‰ใฉใ“ใ‹ใธ่กŒใฃใฆใ—ใพใฃใŸใฎใ ใ‚ใ†ใ€ใจใ€‚' (felt a will in Robopy. They thought he had something on his mind after listening to their conversation, and that's why he went somewhere). The author then clarifies that it was just a program activating, but it *appeared* as if it was an action born from a consistent decision-making mechanism. Option 3, 'ใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒฉใƒ ใŒไฝœๅ‹•ใ—ใฆใ€ๆ„ๆ€ใŒใ‚ใ‚‹ใ‹ใฎใ‚ˆใ†ใซใƒญใƒœใƒ”ใƒผใŒๅ‹•ใ„ใŸใ€‚' (A program activated, and Robopy moved as if it had a will), correctly captures this perception.

Why other options are incorrect:
ใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒฉใƒ ใซ้–“้•ใ„ใŒใ‚ใ‚Šใ€ใƒญใƒœใƒ”ใƒผใซๆ„ๆ€ใŒ็”Ÿใพใ‚Œใฆๅ‹•ใ„ใŸใ€‚

The author explicitly states it was a program activating, not a mistake in the program leading to a 'will' being born.

ใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒฉใƒ ใŒไฝœๅ‹•ใ—ใŸใฎใงใฏใชใใ€ใƒญใƒœใƒ”ใƒผ่‡ช่บซใŒ่€ƒใˆใฆๅ‹•ใ„ใŸใ€‚

The author clarifies that it was a program activating, not Robopy thinking and moving on its own.

ใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒฉใƒ ใŒ่ชคไฝœๅ‹•ใ—ใฆใ€ๅˆถไฝœ่€…ใฎๆ„ๅ›ณใซๅใ—ใฆใƒญใƒœใƒ”ใƒผใŒๅ‹•ใ„ใŸ

The author doesn't state it was a malfunction or against the creator's intent, but rather an unexpected outcome of complex programming that *appeared* intentional.

Question 59

ใ€Œๅฟƒใ€ใซใคใ„ใฆใ€็ญ†่€…ใฏใฉใฎใ‚ˆใ†ใซ่€ƒใˆใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ‹ใ€‚

1.ใ‚ใ‚‹ใจๆ€ใฃใฆ่ฆณๅฏŸใ™ใ‚Œใฐใ€่ค‡้›‘ใชๅ‹•ใใฎๆ„ๅ›ณใŒ็†่งฃใงใใ‚‹ใ€‚
2.ๅฎŸไฝ“ใŒใชใ„ใฎใงใ€ใ‚ใ‚‹ใจใ‹ใชใ„ใจใ‹ๆƒณๅƒใ—ใฆใ‚‚ๆ„ๅ‘ณใŒใชใ„ใ€‚
3.ไป•็ต„ใฟใŒ่ค‡้›‘ใ™ใŽใ‚‹ใŸใ‚ใ€ไบบ้–“ๅŒๅฃซใงใ‚ใฃใฆใ‚‚ๆƒณๅƒใงใใชใ„ใ€‚
4.็†่งฃใ—ใใ‚Œใชใ„่ค‡้›‘ใชๅ‹•ใใ‚’่ฆ‹ใŸใจใใซใ€ไบบ้–“ใŒๆƒณๅƒใ™ใ‚‹ใ‚‚ใฎใ ใ€‚ Correct
Correct Answer: 4. ็†่งฃใ—ใใ‚Œใชใ„่ค‡้›‘ใชๅ‹•ใใ‚’่ฆ‹ใŸใจใใซใ€ไบบ้–“ใŒๆƒณๅƒใ™ใ‚‹ใ‚‚ใฎใ ใ€‚
Detailed Explanation
Why this is correct:

The author concludes that 'ๅฟƒใจใฏใ€่ฆณๅฏŸใ™ใ‚‹ๅดใฎๅ•้กŒใงใ‚ใ‚‹' (Mind is a matter for the observer). He explains that when faced with something so complex that one cannot fully understand or reproduce its mechanism in their mind (like a complex insect or Robopy), 'ใ€Œใ“ใ„ใคใฏใ€็งใฎ็Ÿฅใ‚‰ใชใ„ใจใ“ใ‚ใงๅ‹ๆ‰‹ใซ็‹ฌ็ซ‹ใ—ใฆ่€ƒใˆใ€ๅ‹•ใ„ใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใฎใ ใ‚ใ†ใ€ใจใ„ใ†ๆƒณๅƒใŒๅƒใใ€‚ใใฎๆตฎใ‹ใ‚“ใงใใŸๆƒณๅƒใซๅๅ‰ใ‚’ใคใ‘ใšใซใฏใ„ใ‚‰ใ‚Œใชใใชใ‚‹ใ€‚ใใ‚Œใ‚’ใ€Œๅฟƒใ€ใจๅ‘ผใ‚“ใงใ„ใ‚‹ใฎใ ใ€‚' (The imagination works that 'this thing must be thinking and moving independently in ways I don't know.' One can't help but name that imagination. That is what is called 'mind'). Option 4, '็†่งฃใ—ใใ‚Œใชใ„่ค‡้›‘ใชๅ‹•ใใ‚’่ฆ‹ใŸใจใใซใ€ไบบ้–“ใŒๆƒณๅƒใ™ใ‚‹ใ‚‚ใฎใ ใ€‚' (It is something humans imagine when they see complex movements they cannot fully comprehend), perfectly summarizes this view.

Why other options are incorrect:
ใ‚ใ‚‹ใจๆ€ใฃใฆ่ฆณๅฏŸใ™ใ‚Œใฐใ€่ค‡้›‘ใชๅ‹•ใใฎๆ„ๅ›ณใŒ็†่งฃใงใใ‚‹ใ€‚

The author states that mind is an imagination when faced with *uncomprehendable* complexity, not that observing with the belief of a mind helps understand its intent.

ๅฎŸไฝ“ใŒใชใ„ใฎใงใ€ใ‚ใ‚‹ใจใ‹ใชใ„ใจใ‹ๆƒณๅƒใ—ใฆใ‚‚ๆ„ๅ‘ณใŒใชใ„ใ€‚

The author argues that mind is an *imagination* that arises from observing complex movements, not that it has no substance and is meaningless to imagine.

ไป•็ต„ใฟใŒ่ค‡้›‘ใ™ใŽใ‚‹ใŸใ‚ใ€ไบบ้–“ๅŒๅฃซใงใ‚ใฃใฆใ‚‚ๆƒณๅƒใงใใชใ„ใ€‚

The passage states that even between humans, we feel each other have minds because we cannot fully comprehend each other's complex mechanisms, implying that it *is* something humans imagine even for each other, not that it's impossible to imagine due to complexity.

ๅ•้กŒ11 ๆฌกใฎAใจBใฎๆ„่ฆ‹ๆ–‡ใ‚’่ชญใ‚“ใงใ€ ๅพŒใฎๅ•ใ„ใซๅฏพใ™ใ‚‹็ญ”ใˆใจใ—ใฆๆœ€ใ‚‚ใ‚ˆใ„ใ‚‚ใฎใ‚’ใ€1ใƒป2ใƒป3ใƒป4 ใ‹ใ‚‰ไธ€ใค้ธใณใชใ•ใ„ใ€‚

Reading Passage

A
็งใฏๆ™ฎๆฎตใ‹ใ‚‰ใƒกใƒข้ญ”๏ผˆๆณจ๏ผ‰ใงใ™ใŒใ€ไบบใฎ่ฌ›ๆผ”ใซ่กŒใใจใ€ๅฟ…ๆญปใซใƒกใƒขใ‚’ๅ–ใ‚ŠใชใŒใ‚‰่ฉฑใ‚’่žใใพใ™ใ€‚ใ›ใฃใ‹ใใใฎๅ ดใซใ„ใ‚‹ใฎใ ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€ๆœ€ๅคง้™ๅธๅŽใ—ใฆๅธฐใ‚ใ†ใจ่€ƒใˆใพใ™ใ€‚ใ‚ใ‚‹ใ„ใฏๅ‹้”ใจใใ ใ‚‰ใชใ„่ฉฑใ‚’ใ—ใฆใ„ใ‚‹ๆ™‚ใงใ‚‚ใ€ใ€Œใ‚ใ‚Œ๏ผŸใ€ใจๆ€ใฃใŸใ“ใจใ‚„ใ€ใ€Œใ„ใ„่ฉฑใ ใ€ใจๆ€ใฃใŸใ“ใจใฏใ€ไฝ•ใงใ‚‚ใใฎๅ ดใงใƒกใƒขใ‚’ๅ–ใ‚‹ใ‚ˆใ†ใซใ—ใฆใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚ใใ“ใงๆ„Ÿใ˜ใŸไฝ•ใ‹ใ‚„ใ€ๆ–ฐใ—ใ็Ÿฅใ‚Šๅพ—ใŸใ‚‚ใฎใฏใ€ๅˆฅใฎๆฉŸไผšใซ่‡ชๅˆ†ใฎๅฝนใซ็ซ‹ใคใ‹ใ‚‚ใ—ใ‚Œใชใ„ใ‹ใ‚‰ใงใ™ใ€‚

ๆ–ฐใ—ใ„็™บๆƒณใ‚„่€ƒใˆๆ–นใฎใƒ’ใƒณใƒˆใ‚’ๅพ—ใŸใ„ใจใ„ใคใ‚‚ๅ•้กŒๆ„่ญ˜ใ‚’ๆŒใฃใฆใ„ใ‚Œใฐใ€ไฝ•ๆฐ—ใชใ„ไบบใฎ็™บ่จ€ใฎใชใ‹ใซใ‚‚็™บ่ฆ‹ใŒใ‚ใ‚‹ใฏใšใงใ™ใ€‚ใƒกใƒขใ‚’ๅ–ใ‚‰ใชใ‘ใ‚Œใฐๅฟ˜ใ‚Œใฆใ—ใพใ„ใพใ™ใฎใงใ€ๅฟ…็„ถ็š„ใซใƒกใƒขใ‚’ๅ–ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใซใชใ‚Šใพใ™ใ€‚ๆ‰‹ใ‚’ๅ‹•ใ‹ใ—ใฆใ€่จ˜้Œฒใ‚’ๅ–ใ‚‹็ตๆžœใ€่จ˜ๆ†ถใซใ‚‚ๆฎ‹ใ‚Šใ‚„ใ™ใใชใ‚Šใพใ™ใ€‚ใ“ใ†ใ—ใฆๆ„่ญ˜ๅŒ–ใƒปๅฏ่ฆ–ๅŒ–ใ™ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใŒๅคงๅˆ‡ใชใฎใงใ™ใ€‚

๏ผˆๆณจ๏ผ‰ใƒกใƒข้ญ”๏ผš ไฝ•ใงใ‚‚ใƒกใƒขใ‚’ๅ–ใ‚‹ไบบ

B
่ฉฑใ‚’่žใ„ใฆใ„ใ‚‹ๆ™‚ใซใ€่ฆ–็ทšใ‚‚ไธŠใ’ใšใซใŸใ ใฒใŸใ™ใ‚‰ใƒกใƒขใ‚’ๅ–ใฃใฆใ„ใ‚‹ไบบใŒใ„ใ‚‹ใ€‚็†ฑๅฟƒใ•ใฏไผใ‚ใ‚‹ใŒใ€่ณชๅ•ใ‚‚ใ•ใ‚Œใชใ„ใจ่ˆˆๅ‘ณใ‚„้–ขๅฟƒใ‚’ๆŒใฃใฆ่žใ„ใฆใ‚‚ใ‚‰ใˆใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใฎใ‹ไธๅฎ‰ใซใชใ‚‹ใ€‚ใ“ใฎใ‚ˆใ†ใชไบบใฏใ€ใƒกใƒขใ‚’ๅ–ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใŒ็›ฎ็š„ใซใชใฃใฆใ—ใพใฃใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใฎใงใฏใชใ„ใ‹ใ€‚ๅคšใใฎๆƒ…ๅ ฑใ‚’ๆญฃ็ขบใซๆ›ธใใจใ‚‹ใ“ใจใซ้›†ไธญใ—ใฆใ—ใพใ„ใ€่‚ๅฟƒใชๅ†…ๅฎนใŒ้ ญใซๅ…ฅใฃใฆใ„ใชใ„ใฎใ ใ€‚

ใ—ใ‹ใ—ใฉใ‚“ใชใซๆญฃ็ขบใซใƒกใƒขใ‚’ๅ–ใฃใŸใจใ—ใฆใ‚‚ใ€ๅ†…ๅฎนใŒ็†่งฃใงใใฆใ„ใชใ‘ใ‚Œใฐใ€ใ‚ใจใงใƒกใƒขใ‚’ๆดปใ‹ใ™ใ“ใจใ‚‚ใงใใชใ„ใ€‚ๅ—ใ‘่บซใงใฏใชใใ€่‡ชๅˆ†ใซๅฟ…่ฆใชๆƒ…ๅ ฑใฏไฝ•ใ‹ใ€่‡ชๅˆ†ใ ใฃใŸใ‚‰ใฉใ†ใ™ใ‚‹ใ‹ใจใ„ใ†ใ‚ˆใ†ใซ่‡ชๅˆ†ใจ้–ข้€ฃไป˜ใ‘ใฆใ€ไธปไฝ“็š„ใซ่€ƒใˆใชใŒใ‚‰่žใใ“ใจใŒๅฟ…่ฆใ ใ€‚ใƒกใƒขใฏใ€ใ‚ใจใง่ฉฑใ‚’ๆ•ด็†ใ™ใ‚‹้š›ใฎๆ‰‹ใŒใ‹ใ‚Šใซใชใ‚Œใฐๅๅˆ†ใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€‚
English Summary & Annotations
This section presents two differing opinions (A and B) on the act of 'taking notes' (ใƒกใƒขใ‚’ๅ–ใ‚‹ใ“ใจ: memo o toru koto) and 'listening' (่ฉฑใฎ่žใๆ–น: hanashi no kikikata). Author A, a 'memo maniac' (ใƒกใƒข้ญ”: memo ma), believes in diligently taking notes during lectures or conversations to absorb information, make discoveries, and aid memory, emphasizing the importance of making things conscious (ๆ„่ญ˜ๅŒ–: ishiki-ka) and visible (ๅฏ่ฆ–ๅŒ–: kashi-ka). Author B criticizes those who take notes passively without engaging, arguing that focusing too much on accurate transcription can hinder understanding. B emphasizes the need for active listening, relating information to oneself, and using notes merely as 'clues' (ๆ‰‹ใŒใ‹ใ‚Š: tegakari) for later organization, rather than as the primary goal.
Question 60

ใƒกใƒขใ‚’ๅ–ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใซใคใ„ใฆใ€ A ใจ B ใฏๅŒใฎใ‚ˆใ†ใซ่ฟฐในใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ‹ใ€‚

1.Aใ‚‚Bใ‚‚ใ€้‡ใ‚ˆใ‚Šใ‚‚ๆ›ธใใจใ‚‹ๅ†…ๅฎนใ‚’ๆ„่ญ˜ใ—ใฆๅ–ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใŒ้‡่ฆใ ใจ่ฟฐในใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ€‚
2.Aใ‚‚Bใ‚‚ใ€ใงใใ‚‹ใ ใ‘ๅคšใใฎๆƒ…ๅ ฑใ‚’ๆญฃ็ขบใซๆ›ธใๅ–ใฃใŸใปใ†ใŒใ„ใ„ใจ่ฟฐในใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ€‚
3.Aใฏๅ†…ๅฎนใ‚’ๆดป็”จใ™ใ‚‹ใŸใ‚ใซๅฟ…่ฆใ ใจ่ฟฐในใ€Bใฏๅ–ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใซ้›†ไธญใ—้ŽใŽใฆใฏๆ„ๅ‘ณใŒใชใ„ใจ่ฟฐในใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ€‚ Correct
4.Aใฏๅ•้กŒ็‚นใ‚„ๆ„Ÿๆƒณใชใฉใ‚‚ไธ€็ท’ใซ่จ˜ๅ…ฅใ—ใŸใปใ†ใŒใ„ใ„ใจ่ฟฐในใ€Bใฏ่ฉฑใฎๅ†…ๅฎนใ‚’็†่งฃใ—ใฆใ„ใชใ‘ใ‚Œใฐๆญฃ็ขบใซใฏๅ–ใ‚Œใชใ„ใจ่ฟฐในใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ€‚
Correct Answer: 3. Aใฏๅ†…ๅฎนใ‚’ๆดป็”จใ™ใ‚‹ใŸใ‚ใซๅฟ…่ฆใ ใจ่ฟฐในใ€Bใฏๅ–ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใซ้›†ไธญใ—้ŽใŽใฆใฏๆ„ๅ‘ณใŒใชใ„ใจ่ฟฐในใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ€‚
Detailed Explanation
Why this is correct:

Author A is a 'ใƒกใƒข้ญ”' (memo maniac) who takes notes diligently to absorb as much as possible and to make discoveries, emphasizing that writing helps with memory and makes things conscious/visible. Author B criticizes people who take notes without looking up, focusing too much on accurate transcription, which leads to not understanding the content. B argues that notes should be a 'ๆ‰‹ใŒใ‹ใ‚Š' (clue) for organizing thoughts later, and one should listen actively, relating information to oneself. Therefore, A emphasizes the necessity of taking notes for active learning and utilization, while B warns against taking notes passively without understanding. Option 3, 'Aใฏๅ†…ๅฎนใ‚’ๆดป็”จใ™ใ‚‹ใŸใ‚ใซๅฟ…่ฆใ ใจ่ฟฐในใ€Bใฏๅ–ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใซ้›†ไธญใ—้ŽใŽใฆใฏๆ„ๅ‘ณใŒใชใ„ใจ่ฟฐในใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ€‚' (A states it's necessary for utilizing content, and B states focusing too much on taking notes is meaningless), accurately captures their differing views.

Why other options are incorrect:
Aใ‚‚Bใ‚‚ใ€้‡ใ‚ˆใ‚Šใ‚‚ๆ›ธใใจใ‚‹ๅ†…ๅฎนใ‚’ๆ„่ญ˜ใ—ใฆๅ–ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใŒ้‡่ฆใ ใจ่ฟฐในใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ€‚

A emphasizes taking notes for discovery and memory, implying quantity can be useful, while B criticizes focusing on *accurate transcription* over understanding, not necessarily quantity over content for A.

Aใ‚‚Bใ‚‚ใ€ใงใใ‚‹ใ ใ‘ๅคšใใฎๆƒ…ๅ ฑใ‚’ๆญฃ็ขบใซๆ›ธใๅ–ใฃใŸใปใ†ใŒใ„ใ„ใจ่ฟฐในใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ€‚

B explicitly criticizes focusing on taking *many accurate notes* without understanding, so this is not a common view.

Aใฏๅ•้กŒ็‚นใ‚„ๆ„Ÿๆƒณใชใฉใ‚‚ไธ€็ท’ใซ่จ˜ๅ…ฅใ—ใŸใปใ†ใŒใ„ใ„ใจ่ฟฐในใ€Bใฏ่ฉฑใฎๅ†…ๅฎนใ‚’็†่งฃใ—ใฆใ„ใชใ‘ใ‚Œใฐๆญฃ็ขบใซใฏๅ–ใ‚Œใชใ„ใจ่ฟฐในใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ€‚

A mentions 'felt something' and 'newly acquired things' which could include impressions, but B's point is about understanding the content, not about whether one can take accurate notes without understanding.

Question 61

่ฉฑใฎ่žใๆ–นใซใคใ„ใฆใ€ A ใจ B ใฎ่ช่ญ˜ใงๅ…ฑ้€šใ—ใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ“ใจใฏไฝ•ใ‹ใ€‚

1.ไฝ•ใ‹ใ‚’ๅพ—ใ‚ˆใ†ใจใ„ใ†ๅงฟๅ‹ขใง่žใใ“ใจใŒ้‡่ฆใ ใ€‚ Correct
2.ใใฎๅ ดใงใ™ในใฆใ‚’็†่งฃใ—ใ‚ˆใ†ใจใ—ใชใใฆใ‚‚ใ„ใ„ใ€‚
3.ๆ‰‹ใ‚’ๅ‹•ใ‹ใ—ใชใŒใ‚‰่žใ„ใŸใปใ†ใŒใ€่จ˜ๆ†ถใซๆฎ‹ใ‚Šใ‚„ใ™ใ„ใ€‚
4.่ˆˆๅ‘ณใ‚„้–ขๅฟƒใ‚’็คบใ—ใ€่ฉฑใ—ๆ‰‹ใซๅฎ‰ๅฟƒๆ„Ÿใ‚’ไธŽใˆใ‚‹ใ“ใจใŒๅคงๅˆ‡ใ ใ€‚
Correct Answer: 1. ไฝ•ใ‹ใ‚’ๅพ—ใ‚ˆใ†ใจใ„ใ†ๅงฟๅ‹ขใง่žใใ“ใจใŒ้‡่ฆใ ใ€‚
Detailed Explanation
Why this is correct:

Author A states, 'ๆœ€ๅคง้™ๅธๅŽใ—ใฆๅธฐใ‚ใ†ใจ่€ƒใˆใพใ™ใ€‚' (I think about absorbing as much as possible and returning). Author B states, 'ๅ—ใ‘่บซใงใฏใชใใ€่‡ชๅˆ†ใซๅฟ…่ฆใชๆƒ…ๅ ฑใฏไฝ•ใ‹ใ€่‡ชๅˆ†ใ ใฃใŸใ‚‰ใฉใ†ใ™ใ‚‹ใ‹ใจใ„ใ†ใ‚ˆใ†ใซ่‡ชๅˆ†ใจ้–ข้€ฃไป˜ใ‘ใฆใ€ไธปไฝ“็š„ใซ่€ƒใˆใชใŒใ‚‰่žใใ“ใจใŒๅฟ…่ฆใ ใ€‚' (It is necessary to listen actively, not passively, by relating information to oneself, thinking about what information is necessary for oneself, and what one would do). Both emphasize an active approach to listening with the goal of gaining something useful. Option 1, 'ไฝ•ใ‹ใ‚’ๅพ—ใ‚ˆใ†ใจใ„ใ†ๅงฟๅ‹ขใง่žใใ“ใจใŒ้‡่ฆใ ใ€‚' (It is important to listen with an attitude of trying to gain something), is the common point.

Why other options are incorrect:
ใใฎๅ ดใงใ™ในใฆใ‚’็†่งฃใ—ใ‚ˆใ†ใจใ—ใชใใฆใ‚‚ใ„ใ„ใ€‚

A implies absorbing as much as possible *at the moment*, while B emphasizes understanding the content *at the moment* to utilize notes later. Neither explicitly states it's okay not to understand everything on the spot.

ๆ‰‹ใ‚’ๅ‹•ใ‹ใ—ใชใŒใ‚‰่žใ„ใŸใปใ†ใŒใ€่จ˜ๆ†ถใซๆฎ‹ใ‚Šใ‚„ใ™ใ„ใ€‚

A mentions writing helps memory, but B does not share this view; B focuses on active listening and understanding, with notes as a mere 'clue'.

่ˆˆๅ‘ณใ‚„้–ขๅฟƒใ‚’็คบใ—ใ€่ฉฑใ—ๆ‰‹ใซๅฎ‰ๅฟƒๆ„Ÿใ‚’ไธŽใˆใ‚‹ใ“ใจใŒๅคงๅˆ‡ใ ใ€‚

B mentions that not asking questions makes the speaker anxious, implying showing interest is important, but A does not mention this aspect of listening.

ๅ•้กŒ12 ๆฌกใฎๆ–‡็ซ ใ‚’่ชญใ‚“ใงใ€ๅพŒใฎๅ•ใ„ใซๅฏพใ™ใ‚‹็ญ”ใˆใจใ—ใฆใ€ๆœ€ใ‚‚ใ‚ˆใ„ใ‚‚ใฎใ‚’ใ€1โ€ข 2 โ€ข 3 โ€ข 4 ใ‹ใ‚‰ไธ€ใค้ธใณใชใ•ใ„ใ€‚

Reading Passage

ไผๆฅญใซใจใฃใฆใ‚‚ใ€ไบบใ€…ใซใจใฃใฆใ‚‚ใ€ใ•ใใฎใฟใˆใชใ„ไธๅฎ‰ใชๆ™‚ไปฃใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€ใใ—ใฆใใ‚“ใชไธๅฎ‰ใชๆ™‚ไปฃใ‚’็”Ÿใใ‚‹ๅญไพ›ใŸใกใซใ€ใ€Œ็”Ÿใใ‚‹ๅŠ›ใ€ใ‚’ใคใ‘ใ•ใ›ใŸใ„ใจใ„ใ†ใ€Œ่ฆชๅฟƒใ€ใฏใ€ใ‚ใ‹ใ‚‰ใชใ„ใงใฏใชใ„ใ€‚ใพใŸไผๆฅญใฎ็ตŒๅ–ถ่€…ใŒใ€ๅฐ‘ใ—ใงใ‚‚ๅ„ช็ง€ใชไบบๆใ‚’ๅ–ใ‚Š่พผใฟใŸใ„ใจ่€ƒใˆใ‚‹ใฎใฏใ€ๅฟ…็„ถใงใฏใ‚ใ‚‹ใ ใ‚ใ†ใ€‚ๅœฐๅŸŸใฎ่กฐ้€€ใ‚„็”ฃๆฅญใฎ็ฉบๆดžๅŒ–ใ‚’้ฃŸใ„ๆญขใ‚ใ‚‰ใ‚Œใ‚‹ไบบ้–“ใŒ็พใ‚Œใฆใใ‚Œใ‚Œใฐใ€ใ‚ใŸใ—ใŸใกใฎไธๅฎ‰ใชๆฐ—ๆŒใกใ‚‚ใ€ใ„ใใถใ‚“ใชใ‚Šใจใ‚‚ๅ’Œใ‚‰ใใจใ„ใ†ใ‚‚ใฎใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€‚

ใ—ใ‹ใ—ใ€ใพใŒใ‚Šใชใ‚Šใซใ‚‚ๆ•™่‚ฒๅญฆใ‚’ๅฐ‚้–€ใจใ™ใ‚‹่€…ใจใ—ใฆใ€ใ“ใ“ใฏ่จ€ใ‚ใ›ใฆใปใ—ใ„ใ€‚็พไปฃๆ—ฅๆœฌ็คพไผšใฎๅ•้กŒใ‚’ใ€ใชใ‚“ใงใ‚‚ใ‹ใ‚“ใงใ‚‚ๆ•™่‚ฒใง่งฃๆฑบใ—ใ‚ˆใ†ใจใ„ใ†ใฎใฏใ„ใŸใ ใ‘ใชใ„ใ€‚

็ขบใ‹ใซๆ•™่‚ฒใฏใ€ไบบ้–“ใ‚’่‚ฒใฆใ‚‹ใ“ใจใ‚’้€šใ˜ใฆใ€ไบบใ€…ใฎไบบ็”Ÿใ‚„็คพไผšใฎๆœชๆฅใซๅฏพใ—ใฆใ€ไธ€ๅฎšใฎ่ฒข็Œฎใ‚’็‚บใ™ใ“ใจใŒใงใใ‚‹ใ€‚ใ—ใ‹ใ—ใ‚ใŸใ—ใซ่จ€ใ‚ใ›ใ‚Œใฐใ€ใใฎใ‚ˆใ†ใชๆ•™่‚ฒใฎๅฝน็ซ‹ใกใฎๅบฆๅˆใ„ใฏใ€ๆฑบใ—ใฆๅคงใใ„ใ‚‚ใฎใงใฏใชใ„ใ€‚ๆ•™่‚ฒใซใฏไธ็ขบๅฎšๆ€งใŒใคใใ‚‚ใฎใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€‚ใ“ใ‚Œใฏใ‚‚ใ†ใ€ๆ•™ๅ“ก้คŠๆˆใฎใƒ†ใ‚ญใ‚นใƒˆใงใ‚‚่ซ–ใ˜ใ‚‰ใ‚Œใ‚‹ใ€Œๆ•™่‚ฒๅญฆใฎๅŸบๆœฌใฎใ‚ญใ€ใ ใ€‚ๆ•™ใˆใŸใ‹ใ‚‰ใจใ„ใฃใฆใ€ใใฎๅˆ†ใ ใ‘ๅญใฉใ‚‚ใŒ่‚ฒใคใจใ„ใ†ใ‚ใ‘ใงใฏใชใ„ใ—ใ€ๆ•™ใˆใŸใคใ‚‚ใ‚ŠใŒใชใ„ใฎใซใ€ๅญไพ›ใฎๆ–นใŒๅ‹ๆ‰‹ใซๅญฆใ‚“ใงใ„ใ‚‹ใจใ„ใ†ใ“ใจใ‚‚ใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€‚ใ‚‚ใกใ‚ใ‚“ๆ•™ๅธซใ‚‚ๆ•™่‚ฒๅญฆ่€…ใ‚‚ใ€ใใฎ็ขบ็އ่ซ–็š„ใช่‚ฒใกใ‚’ใฉใ†ใซใ‹ใ—ใฆๆœ›ใพใ—ใ„ๆ–นๅ‘ใซๅ‘ใ‘ใ‚‹ๅŠชๅŠ›ใฏใ™ใ‚‹ใŒใ€ใชใ‚“ใจ่จ€ใฃใฆใ‚‚่‚ฒใคใฎใฏๅญใฉใ‚‚ใชใฎใ ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€ใ€Œๆœ€ๅฐ้™ใฎใ‚ณใ‚นใƒˆใงๆœ€ๅคง้™ใฎใƒกใƒชใƒƒใƒˆใ‚’้”ๆˆใ—ใชใ•ใ„ใ€ใ€Œๅฟ…่ฆใชไบบๆใ‚’ใใฃใกใ‚Šใใฃใ‹ใ‚Šใ€่€ณใ‚’ใใ‚ใˆใฆ๏ผˆๆณจ1๏ผ‰็คพไผšใซ็ดๅ“ใ—ใชใ•ใ„ใ€ใชใฉใจใ„ใ†ๆณจๆ–‡ใ‚’ใ€ใใ†ใใ†่ซ‹ใ‘่ฒ ใ†ใ“ใจใฏใงใใชใ„ใ€‚

ใใ‚Œใซใใ‚‚ใใ‚‚ๆ•™่‚ฒใฏใ€็ตŒๆธˆใฎใŸใ‚ใ ใ‘ใฎใ‚‚ใฎใงใ‚‚ใ€ๅ…ฑๅŒไฝ“ใฎ็ถญๆŒใฎใŸใ‚ใ ใ‘ใฎใ‚‚ใฎใงใ‚‚ใ€ๅฎถๆ—ใฎใŸใ‚ใ ใ‘ใฎใ‚‚ใฎใงใ‚‚ใชใ„ใ€‚ๅธ‚ๅ ดใ‚‚ใ€ๅ›ฝๅฎถใ‚‚ใ€ๅœฐๅŸŸๅ…ฑๅŒไฝ“ใ‚‚ใ€ใใ—ใฆๅฎถๆ—ใ‚‚ใ€ใ‚‚ใฃใจๅฝนใซ็ซ‹ใคๆ•™่‚ฒใ‚’ใ—ใ‚ใ€ๆ„ๅ‘ณใฎใ‚ใ‚‹ๆ•™่‚ฒใ‚’ใ—ใ‚ใจ่จ€ใ†ใ‘ใ‚Œใฉใ€ใใ‚Œใžใ‚Œๆณจๆ–‡ใฏใƒใƒฉใƒใƒฉใชใฎใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€‚ใ‚‚ใกใ‚ใ‚“ๆ•™่‚ฒใฏใ€ใใ‚Œใžใ‚Œใฎ่ฆๆฑ‚ใซ๏ผˆ็ขบ็އ่ซ–็š„ใซ๏ผ‰ๅฐ‘ใ—ใšใค่ฒข็Œฎใฏใ™ใ‚‹ใ€‚ใ—ใ‹ใ—ใใ‚Œใ‚’ใ‚‚ใฃใฆๆŽจใ—้€ฒใ‚ใฆใ€ใฉใ‚Œใ‹ใฎ็›ฎ็š„ใฎใŸใ‚ใ ใ‘ใซๅˆ็†ๅŒ–ใƒปๅŠน็އๅŒ–ใ—ใ‚ˆใ†ใจใ™ใ‚Œใฐใ€ๆ•™่‚ฒใฏใšใ„ใถใ‚“ใจๆญชใช๏ผˆๆณจ2๏ผ‰ใ‚‚ใฎใซใชใ‚‹ใ€‚ใพใ—ใฆใ€ใฟใ‚“ใชใŒใฟใ‚“ใชๆ•™่‚ฒใ‹ใ‚‰ใใ‚Œใžใ‚Œใฎๅˆฉ็›Šใ‚’ๅผ•ใๅ‡บใใ†ใจ่บ่ตทใซใชใฃใฆใ‚‚๏ผˆๆณจ3๏ผ‰ใ€ใใ‚“ใช้Žๅ‰ฐใชๆœŸๅพ…ใซๅผ•ใ่ฃ‚ใ‹ใ‚ŒใŸๆ•™่‚ฒใŒใ†ใพใๆฉŸ่ƒฝใ™ใ‚‹ใจใฏๆ€ใˆใชใ„ใ€‚
๏ผˆไธญ็•ฅ๏ผ‰

ๅœๆปžใฎ็ถšใใ“ใฎ็คพไผšใงใ€่ชฐใ‚‚ใŒไธๅฎ‰ใซๆŠผใ—ใคใถใ•ใ‚Œใ€ใกใ‚‡ใ†ใฉใใฎๅˆ†ใ ใ‘ๆ•™่‚ฒใซ้Žๅ‰ฐใชๆœŸๅพ…ใ‚„ๅธŒๆœ›ใ‚’่จ—ใใ†ใจใ—ใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ€‚ใใฎ็ตๆžœใ€ๆ•™่‚ฒใ€ใชใ‹ใงใ‚‚ๅญฆๆ กๆ•™่‚ฒใŒใ€ๆ”น้ฉใฎๆณขใซๅ‘‘ใพใ‚Œใ€ไฝ™่ฃ•ใ‚’ใชใใ—ใใ†ใซใชใฃใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ€‚ๆ•™่‚ฒใซๅคšใใ‚’ใ‚‚ใจใ‚ใ™ใŽใ‚‹ใจ่ญฆๅ ฑใ‚’้ณดใ‚‰ใ™ใ“ใจใฏใ€็ตๆžœ็š„ใซใ€ใ“ใฎ็คพไผšใจ็คพไผšใจๆ•™่‚ฒใ‚’ๆŒ็ถšใ•ใ›ใ‚‹ใŸใ‚ใซใ„ใพไธ€็•ชๅฟ…่ฆใชใ“ใจใชใฎใงใฏใชใ„ใ ใ‚ใ†ใ‹

๏ผˆๆณจ1๏ผ‰ ่€ณใ‚’ใใ‚ใˆใฆ๏ผšไธ่ถณใชใ
๏ผˆๆณจ2๏ผ‰ ๆญชใช๏ผšใ‚†ใŒใ‚“ใ 
๏ผˆๆณจ 3๏ผ‰ ่บ่ตทใซใชใฃใฆใ‚‚๏ผšๅฟ…ๆญปใซใชใฃใฆ
English Summary & Annotations
This passage discusses the role and limitations of 'education' (ๆ•™่‚ฒ: kyลiku) in modern Japanese society. The author acknowledges the desire of parents and companies to foster 'life skills' (็”Ÿใใ‚‹ๅŠ›: ikiru chikara) and acquire talented individuals in uncertain times. However, as an education specialist, the author argues against the tendency to expect education to solve all societal problems. The author states that education's contribution is 'by no means great' (ๆฑบใ—ใฆๅคงใใ„ใ‚‚ใฎใงใฏใชใ„: kesshite ลkii mono de wa nai) due to its inherent 'unpredictability' (ไธ็ขบๅฎšๆ€ง: fukakuteisei) โ€“ children don't always grow as taught, and sometimes learn independently. Furthermore, education is not solely for economic, communal, or familial purposes; various entities have disparate demands, and trying to rationalize education for a single purpose would distort it. The author warns that excessive expectations placed on education, especially school education, are causing it to lose flexibility and that sounding this alarm is crucial for the sustainability of society and education.
Question 62

<u>ๆฑบใ—ใฆๅคงใใ„ใ‚‚ใฎใงใฏใชใ„</u>ใจ่€ƒใˆใ‚‹็†็”ฑใจใ—ใฆใ€็ญ†่€…ใŒ่ฟฐในใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใฎใฏใฉใ‚Œใ‹ใ€‚

1.ไผๆฅญใ‚„็คพไผšใŒๆœ›ใ‚€ไบบๆใจใ€ๆ•™่‚ฒๅญฆใง็›ฎๆจ™ใจใ™ใ‚‹ไบบๆใฏ็•ฐใชใ‚‹ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚
2.ใ€Œ็”Ÿใใ‚‹ๅŠ›ใ€ใ‚’ใคใ‘ใ‚‹ใŸใ‚ใซๅฟ…่ฆใชใ“ใจใฏใ€ๆ˜Ž็ขบใงใฏใชใ„ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚
3.ๅญใฉใ‚‚ไธ€ไบบไธ€ไบบใซไฝตใ›ใฆใ€ๆ•™่‚ฒใฎๅ†…ๅฎนใ‚’ๅค‰ใˆใ‚‰ใ‚Œใชใ„ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚
4.ๅญใฉใ‚‚ใฏใ€ๆ•™ใˆใŸใจใŠใ‚Šใซ่‚ฒใคใจใฏใ‹ใŽใ‚‰ใชใ„ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚ Correct
Correct Answer: 4. ๅญใฉใ‚‚ใฏใ€ๆ•™ใˆใŸใจใŠใ‚Šใซ่‚ฒใคใจใฏใ‹ใŽใ‚‰ใชใ„ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚
Detailed Explanation
Why this is correct:

The author states that the usefulness of education is 'ๆฑบใ—ใฆๅคงใใ„ใ‚‚ใฎใงใฏใชใ„' (by no means great) because 'ๆ•™ใˆใŸใ‹ใ‚‰ใจใ„ใฃใฆใ€ใใฎๅˆ†ใ ใ‘ๅญใฉใ‚‚ใŒ่‚ฒใคใจใ„ใ†ใ‚ใ‘ใงใฏใชใ„ใ—ใ€ๆ•™ใˆใŸใคใ‚‚ใ‚ŠใŒใชใ„ใฎใซใ€ๅญไพ›ใฎๆ–นใŒๅ‹ๆ‰‹ใซๅญฆใ‚“ใงใ„ใ‚‹ใจใ„ใ†ใ“ใจใ‚‚ใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€‚' (Just because you teach, it doesn't mean children will grow proportionally, and sometimes children learn on their own even when you didn't intend to teach them). This highlights the inherent unpredictability of education. Option 4, 'ๅญใฉใ‚‚ใฏใ€ๆ•™ใˆใŸใจใŠใ‚Šใซ่‚ฒใคใจใฏใ‹ใŽใ‚‰ใชใ„ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚' (Because children do not necessarily grow as they are taught), directly reflects this reason.

Why other options are incorrect:
ไผๆฅญใ‚„็คพไผšใŒๆœ›ใ‚€ไบบๆใจใ€ๆ•™่‚ฒๅญฆใง็›ฎๆจ™ใจใ™ใ‚‹ไบบๆใฏ็•ฐใชใ‚‹ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚

The passage mentions different demands from society/companies but doesn't state this as the reason for education's limited usefulness in general.

ใ€Œ็”Ÿใใ‚‹ๅŠ›ใ€ใ‚’ใคใ‘ใ‚‹ใŸใ‚ใซๅฟ…่ฆใชใ“ใจใฏใ€ๆ˜Ž็ขบใงใฏใชใ„ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚

The passage discusses the unpredictability of learning, not the clarity of what '็”Ÿใใ‚‹ๅŠ›' (life skills) entails.

ๅญใฉใ‚‚ไธ€ไบบไธ€ไบบใซไฝตใ›ใฆใ€ๆ•™่‚ฒใฎๅ†…ๅฎนใ‚’ๅค‰ใˆใ‚‰ใ‚Œใชใ„ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€‚

The passage mentions that children grow unpredictably, not that education cannot be tailored to individual children.

Question 63

ๆ•™่‚ฒใซใคใ„ใฆใ€็ญ†่€…ใฎ่€ƒใˆใซๅˆใ†ใฎใฏใฉใ‚Œใ‹ใ€‚

1.ใใ‚Œใžใ‚Œใฎ็›ฎ็š„ใซๅˆใ‚ใ›ใฆๅˆ็†ๅŒ–ใƒปๅŠน็އๅŒ–ใ—ใชใ‘ใ‚Œใฐใ€ๆฉŸ่ƒฝใ—ใชใ„ใ€‚
2.ใฟใ‚“ใชใงไธ€ใคใฎ็›ฎ็š„ใ‚’ๅ…ฑๆœ‰ใ—ใชใ‘ใ‚Œใฐใ€ๅŠนๆžœใฏไธŠใŒใ‚‰ใชใ„ใ€‚
3.็‰นๅฎšใฎ็›ฎ็š„ใ‚’ๆžœใŸใ™ใŸใ‚ใซๅญ˜ๅœจใ™ใ‚‹ใ‚‚ใฎใงใฏใชใ„ Correct
4.ๅฝนใซ็ซ‹ใคใ‹ใฉใ†ใ‹ใจใ„ใ†่ฆณ็‚นใง่ฉ•ไพกใ•ใ‚Œใ‚‹ในใใ ใ€‚
Correct Answer: 3. ็‰นๅฎšใฎ็›ฎ็š„ใ‚’ๆžœใŸใ™ใŸใ‚ใซๅญ˜ๅœจใ™ใ‚‹ใ‚‚ใฎใงใฏใชใ„
Detailed Explanation
Why this is correct:

The author argues that education is not solely for economic purposes, community maintenance, or family. 'ๅธ‚ๅ ดใ‚‚ใ€ๅ›ฝๅฎถใ‚‚ใ€ๅœฐๅŸŸๅ…ฑๅŒไฝ“ใ‚‚ใ€ใใ—ใฆๅฎถๆ—ใ‚‚ใ€ใ‚‚ใฃใจๅฝนใซ็ซ‹ใคๆ•™่‚ฒใ‚’ใ—ใ‚ใ€ๆ„ๅ‘ณใฎใ‚ใ‚‹ๆ•™่‚ฒใ‚’ใ—ใ‚ใจ่จ€ใ†ใ‘ใ‚Œใฉใ€ใใ‚Œใžใ‚Œๆณจๆ–‡ใฏใƒใƒฉใƒใƒฉใชใฎใงใ‚ใ‚‹ใ€‚' (Markets, states, local communities, and families all demand more useful and meaningful education, but their demands are disparate). The author warns that if education is rationalized/made efficient for only one purpose, it will become distorted. This implies education serves multiple, often conflicting, purposes and should not be confined to a single one. Option 3, '็‰นๅฎšใฎ็›ฎ็š„ใ‚’ๆžœใŸใ™ใŸใ‚ใซๅญ˜ๅœจใ™ใ‚‹ใ‚‚ใฎใงใฏใชใ„' (It does not exist to fulfill a specific purpose), aligns with this view.

Why other options are incorrect:
ใใ‚Œใžใ‚Œใฎ็›ฎ็š„ใซๅˆใ‚ใ›ใฆๅˆ็†ๅŒ–ใƒปๅŠน็އๅŒ–ใ—ใชใ‘ใ‚Œใฐใ€ๆฉŸ่ƒฝใ—ใชใ„ใ€‚

The author argues *against* rationalizing/making education efficient for specific purposes, as it would distort education.

ใฟใ‚“ใชใงไธ€ใคใฎ็›ฎ็š„ใ‚’ๅ…ฑๆœ‰ใ—ใชใ‘ใ‚Œใฐใ€ๅŠนๆžœใฏไธŠใŒใ‚‰ใชใ„ใ€‚

The author highlights the *disparate* demands from various entities, implying a single shared purpose is not feasible or desirable.

ๅฝนใซ็ซ‹ใคใ‹ใฉใ†ใ‹ใจใ„ใ†่ฆณ็‚นใง่ฉ•ไพกใ•ใ‚Œใ‚‹ในใใ ใ€‚

The author explicitly states that education is not just about being 'useful' in a narrow sense, and warns against evaluating it solely from that perspective, especially when demands are varied.

Question 64

็ญ†่€…ใŒๆœ€ใ‚‚่จ€ใ„ใŸใ„ใ“ใจใฏไฝ•ใ‹ใ€‚

1.ๅคšๆง˜ใช็คพไผšใฎ่ฆๆฑ‚ใซๅฟœใ˜ใ‚‰ใ‚Œใ‚‹ใ‚ˆใ†ใซใ€ๆ•™่‚ฒใฎใ‚ใ‚Šๆ–นใ‚’่€ƒใˆ็›ดใ™ในใใ ใ€‚
2.็คพไผšใฎไธๅฎ‰ใ‚’ๅ–ใ‚Š้™คใใŸใ‚ใซใฏใ€ๆ•™่‚ฒใ‚’ๅˆ็†ๅŒ–ใƒปๅŠน็އๅŒ–ใ™ในใใงใฏใชใ„ใ€‚
3.ๆ•™่‚ฒใฎๆ”น้ฉใซใ‚ˆใฃใฆใ€ๅฎ‰ๅฎšใ—ใŸ็คพไผšใ‚’ๆŒ็ถšใ•ใ›ใฆใ„ใใ“ใจใŒๅฟ…่ฆใ ใ‚ใ†ใ€‚
4.็พไปฃ็คพไผšใฎๅ•้กŒใฎใ™ในใฆใŒใ€ๆ•™่‚ฒใง่งฃๆฑบใงใใ‚‹ใจๆ€ใฃใฆใฏใ„ใ‘ใชใ„ใ€‚ Correct
Correct Answer: 4. ็พไปฃ็คพไผšใฎๅ•้กŒใฎใ™ในใฆใŒใ€ๆ•™่‚ฒใง่งฃๆฑบใงใใ‚‹ใจๆ€ใฃใฆใฏใ„ใ‘ใชใ„ใ€‚
Detailed Explanation
Why this is correct:

The author concludes by stating that in this stagnant society, everyone is overwhelmed by anxiety and places excessive expectations on education. This leads to school education being swallowed by reforms and losing its flexibility. The author's main point is: 'ๆ•™่‚ฒใซๅคšใใ‚’ใ‚‚ใจใ‚ใ™ใŽใ‚‹ใจ่ญฆๅ ฑใ‚’้ณดใ‚‰ใ™ใ“ใจใฏใ€็ตๆžœ็š„ใซใ€ใ“ใฎ็คพไผšใจ็คพไผšใจๆ•™่‚ฒใ‚’ๆŒ็ถšใ•ใ›ใ‚‹ใŸใ‚ใซใ„ใพไธ€็•ชๅฟ…่ฆใชใ“ใจใชใฎใงใฏใชใ„ใ ใ‚ใ†ใ‹' (Perhaps sounding the alarm that we are demanding too much from education is, ultimately, the most necessary thing now to sustain this society and education). This means we should not expect education to solve all societal problems. Option 4, '็พไปฃ็คพไผšใฎๅ•้กŒใฎใ™ในใฆใŒใ€ๆ•™่‚ฒใง่งฃๆฑบใงใใ‚‹ใจๆ€ใฃใฆใฏใ„ใ‘ใชใ„ใ€‚' (One should not think that all problems in modern society can be solved by education), directly reflects this warning against excessive expectations.

Why other options are incorrect:
ๅคšๆง˜ใช็คพไผšใฎ่ฆๆฑ‚ใซๅฟœใ˜ใ‚‰ใ‚Œใ‚‹ใ‚ˆใ†ใซใ€ๆ•™่‚ฒใฎใ‚ใ‚Šๆ–นใ‚’่€ƒใˆ็›ดใ™ในใใ ใ€‚

The author argues against education trying to meet *all* diverse societal demands, as it leads to distortion and loss of function.

็คพไผšใฎไธๅฎ‰ใ‚’ๅ–ใ‚Š้™คใใŸใ‚ใซใฏใ€ๆ•™่‚ฒใ‚’ๅˆ็†ๅŒ–ใƒปๅŠน็އๅŒ–ใ™ในใใงใฏใชใ„ใ€‚

The author argues *against* rationalizing/making education efficient to remove societal anxiety, as it would distort education.

ๆ•™่‚ฒใฎๆ”น้ฉใซใ‚ˆใฃใฆใ€ๅฎ‰ๅฎšใ—ใŸ็คพไผšใ‚’ๆŒ็ถšใ•ใ›ใฆใ„ใใ“ใจใŒๅฟ…่ฆใ ใ‚ใ†ใ€‚

The author suggests that *not* demanding too much from education is necessary to sustain society and education, not that educational reform itself will lead to a stable society.

ๅ•้กŒ13

Reading Passage

ๆœจๅŽŸๅธ‚ๅฅๅบทใฅใใ‚Šใ‚ปใƒณใ‚ฟใƒผ
ใ„ใใ„ใ้‹ๅ‹•ๆ•™ๅฎคใฎใ”ๆกˆๅ†…


ๅฅๅบทใฎใŸใ‚ใซใ€ๆฅฝใ—ใ้‹ๅ‹•ใ—ใพใ›ใ‚“ใ‹ใ€‚ๅฅๅบทใฅใใ‚Šใ‚ปใƒณใ‚ฟใƒผใงใฏใ€ไธ‰ใคใฎใ‚ฏใƒฉใ‚นใ‚’ๆฏŽ้€ฑ้–‹่ฌ›ใ—ใฆใ„ใพใ™(้€šๅนด้–‹่ฌ›)ใ€‚1ๅ›žใ”ใจใฎไบˆ็ด„ๅˆถใชใฎใงใ€ใ”่‡ชๅˆ†ใฎใƒšใƒผใ‚นใงๅ—่ฌ›ใŒใงใใพใ™ใ€‚

ใ€ๅฏพ่ฑกใ€‘
ใƒปไธ‹ใฎโ‘ โ‘กไธกๆ–นใซๅฝ“ใฆใฏใพใ‚‹ๆ–น
โ‘ ๅธ‚ๅ†…ๅœจไฝใ€ใ‚‚ใ—ใใฏๅธ‚ๅ†…ใงๅ‹คๅ‹™ใ—ใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ€18ๆญณไปฅไธŠใฎๆ–น
โ‘กๅฅๅบทใฅใใ‚Šใ‚ปใƒณใ‚ฟใƒผใฎๅฅๅบทๅบฆๆธฌๅฎšใ‚’ใ€ๅ—่ฌ›ๆ—ฅใ‹ใ‚‰้ŽๅŽป1ๅนดไปฅๅ†…ใซๅ—ใ‘ใŸๆ–น
โ€ปๅฅๅบทๅบฆๆธฌๅฎšใฎๅ†…ๅฎนใ‚„ไบˆ็ด„ๆ–นๆณ•็ญ‰ใฎ่ฉณ็ดฐใฏใ€ใƒ›ใƒผใƒ ใƒšใƒผใ‚ธใงใ”็ขบ่ชใใ ใ•ใ„ใ€‚

ๆ›œๆ—ฅ ใ‚ฏใƒฉใ‚นๅ ๅ†…ๅฎน
ๆฐดๆ›œๆ—ฅ ใƒ€ใƒณใ‚น๏ผก ๅˆๅฟƒ่€…ใงใ‚‚ใงใใ‚‹ใ‚†ใฃใใ‚Šใ—ใŸใƒ€ใƒณใ‚นใ‚’ใ—ใพใ™ใ€‚
ๆœจๆ›œๆ—ฅ ใƒ€ใƒณใ‚น B ใƒชใ‚บใƒ ใซๅˆใ‚ใ›ใฆ้€Ÿใๅ‹•ใใƒ€ใƒณใ‚นใ‚’ใ—ใพใ™ใ€‚
้‡‘ๆ›œๆ—ฅ ไฝ“ๆ“ ๅ…จ่บซใ‚’ไฝฟใฃใŸไฝ“ๆ“ใ‚’ใ—ใพใ™ใ€‚

ใ€ˆๆ™‚้–“ใ€‰
10:40-12:00 ใ€ˆไผšๅ ดใ€‰็ฌฌไธ€้‹ๅ‹•ๅฎค ใ€ˆๆ–™้‡‘ใ€‰1ๅ›ž500ๅ††

ใ€ๅˆฉ็”จๆ–นๆณ•ใ€‘
โ—†ไบˆ็ด„ใฎไป•็ต„ใฟ
ใƒป็”ณใ—่พผใฟใฏๅ„ใ‚ฏใƒฉใ‚นๆฏŽๅ›žๅฟ…่ฆใงใ€ๅ…ˆ็€้ †ใงใ™๏ผˆๅ„ใ‚ฏใƒฉใ‚นๅฎšๅ“ก 20 ๅ๏ผ‰
ใƒปไบˆ็ด„ใฎ็จฎ้กžใฏใ€ๅŸบๆœฌไบˆ็ด„ใจ่ฟฝๅŠ ไบˆ็ด„ใŒใ‚ใ‚Šใพใ™ใ€‚

โœ™ๅŸบๆœฌไบˆ็ด„๏ผšใ™ในใฆใฎใ‚ฏใƒฉใ‚นใฎไธญใ‹ใ‚‰้€ฑใซ1ๅ›žๅˆ†ใ ใ‘ไบˆ็ด„ใงใใพใ™ใ€‚ๅŸบๆœฌไบˆ็ด„ใฏใ€ๅ—่ฌ›ๆ—ฅใฎๅ‰ใฎ้€ฑใ‹ใ‚‰ๅฏ่ƒฝใงใ™ใ€‚
โœ™่ฟฝๅŠ ไบˆ็ด„๏ผšๅฎŸๆ–ฝๆ—ฅใฎ2ๆ—ฅๅ‰ใซๅฎšๅ“กใซ้”ใ—ใฆใ„ใชใ„ใ‚ฏใƒฉใ‚นใซ้™ใ‚Šใ€ๅŸบๆœฌไบˆ็ด„1ๅ›žๅˆ†ใฎใปใ‹ใซ่ฟฝๅŠ ไบˆ็ด„ใŒใงใใพใ™ใ€‚่ฟฝๅŠ ไบˆ็ด„ใŒๅฏ่ƒฝใชๅ›žๆ•ฐใฏ้€ฑ1ๅ›žใฎใฟใงใ™ใ€‚็ฉบใใฏ2ๆ—ฅๅ‰ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€ๅฅๅบทใฅใใ‚Šใ‚ปใƒณใ‚ฟใƒผ็ช“ๅฃใ‹้›ป่ฉฑใง็ขบ่ชใงใใพใ™ใ€‚

โ—†ไบˆ็ด„ๆ–นๆณ•
ใƒปใ„ใใ„ใ้‹ๅ‹•ๆ•™ๅฎคใฎไบˆ็ด„ใŒๅˆใ‚ใฆใฎๆ–นใฏใ€ๅฅๅบทๅบฆๆธฌๅฎšใฎ็ตๆžœ็ฅจใ‚’ใŠๆŒใกใซใชใ‚Šใ€็ช“ๅฃใงไบˆ็ด„ใ—ใฆใใ ใ•ใ„ใ€‚ๅ—่ฌ›่€…ใ‚ซใƒผใƒ‰ใ‚’ไฝœใ‚Šใพใ™ใ€‚
ใƒปไบˆ็ด„ใŒ2ๅ›ž็›ฎไปฅ้™ใฎๆ–นใฏใ€ๅฅๅบทใฅใใ‚Šใ‚ปใƒณใ‚ฟใƒผใซใ‚ใ‚‹ไบˆ็ด„ๆฉŸใ‹้›ป่ฉฑใงใ—ใฆใใ ใ•ใ„ใ€‚

โ—†ๆ–™้‡‘ใฎๆ”ฏๆ‰•ใ„
ใƒปๅ—่ฌ›ๆ—ฅๅฝ“ๆ—ฅใซใ€่‡ชๅ‹•ๅ—ไป˜ๆ”ฏๆ‰•ๆฉŸใงๆ–™้‡‘ใ‚’ๆ”ฏๆ‰•ใฃใฆใใ ใ•ใ„๏ผˆๅ—่ฌ›่€…ใ‚ซใƒผใƒ‰ใŒๅฟ…่ฆใงใ™ใ€‚ๅฟ˜ใ‚ŒใŸๆ–นใฏ็ช“ๅฃใงๅฏพๅฟœใ—ใพใ™๏ผ‰ใ€‚

ๆœจๅŽŸๅธ‚ๅฅๅบทใฅใใ‚Šใ‚ปใƒณใ‚ฟใƒผ ้›ป่ฉฑ๏ผš 02-1124-45
English Summary & Annotations
This section provides information about the 'Kihara City Health Promotion Center's Lively Exercise Classes' (ๆœจๅŽŸๅธ‚ๅฅๅบทใฅใใ‚Šใ‚ปใƒณใ‚ฟใƒผ ใ„ใใ„ใ้‹ๅ‹•ๆ•™ๅฎค: Kihara-shi Kenkลzukuri Sentฤ Ikiiki Undล Kyลshitsu). It details the eligibility criteria for participants, including age (18 years or older), residency/workplace (ๆœจๅŽŸๅธ‚ๅ†…: Kihara-shi nai, within Kihara City), and a recent 'health check-up' (ๅฅๅบทๅบฆๆธฌๅฎš: kenkลdo sokutei) within the last year. It also outlines the class schedule (ๆ›œๆ—ฅ: yลbi), content (ๅ†…ๅฎน: naiyล), fees (ๆ–™้‡‘: ryลkin), and the 'reservation system' (ไบˆ็ด„ใฎไป•็ต„ใฟ: yoyaku no shikumi), which includes 'basic reservations' (ๅŸบๆœฌไบˆ็ด„: kihon yoyaku) and 'additional reservations' (่ฟฝๅŠ ไบˆ็ด„: tsuika yoyaku) with specific rules for each.
Question 65

ๆฌกใฎ 4 ไบบใฏไปŠๅนดใฎ4ๆœˆใซใ€้‹ๅ‹•ๆ•™ๅฎคใ‚’ๅ—่ฌ›ใ—ใŸใ„ใจ่€ƒใˆใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ€‚ใ“ใฎไธญใงใ€ใ“ใฎๆ•™ๅฎคใ‚’ๅ—่ฌ›ใงใใ‚‹ไบบใฏ่ชฐใ‹ใ€‚ ๅๅ‰ ๅนด้ฝข ไฝใ‚“ใงใ„ใ‚‹ๆ‰€ ๅ‹คๅ‹™ๅœฐ ๅฅๅบทๅบฆๆธฌๅฎš ใƒ€ใƒ‹ใ‚จใƒซใ•ใ‚“ 54 ๆญณ ๆœจๅŽŸๅธ‚ๅ†… ๆœจๅŽŸๅธ‚ๅค– ๅŽปๅนดใฎ1ๆœˆใซๅ—ใ‘ใŸ ๆœจๆ‘ใ•ใ‚“ 34ๆญณ ๆœจๅŽŸๅธ‚ๅค– ๆœจๅŽŸๅธ‚ๅ†… ๅŽปๅนดใฎ10ๆœˆใซๅ—ใ‘ใŸ ๅคงๅทใ•ใ‚“ 16ๆญณ ๆœจๅŽŸๅธ‚ๅ†… ใชใ— ไปŠๅนดใฎ2ๆœˆใซๅ—ใ‘ใŸ ใƒใ‚งใ•ใ‚“ 27ๆญณ ๆœจๅŽŸๅธ‚ๅ†… ๆœจๅŽŸๅธ‚ๅ†… ไปŠๅนดใฎ5ๆœˆใซๅ—ใ‘ใ‚‹ไบˆๅฎš

1.ใƒ€ใƒ‹ใ‚จใƒซใ•ใ‚“
2.ๆœจๆ‘ใ•ใ‚“ Correct
3.ๅคงๅทใ•ใ‚“
4.ใƒใ‚งใ•ใ‚“
Correct Answer: 2. ๆœจๆ‘ใ•ใ‚“
Detailed Explanation
Why this is correct:

To be eligible for the class in April, participants must meet two conditions: 1) Be 18 years or older and either reside in Kihara City or work in Kihara City. 2) Have received a health check-up at the Health Promotion Center within one year of the class date (i.e., after April of last year). Let's check each person: - ใƒ€ใƒ‹ใ‚จใƒซใ•ใ‚“ (Daniel): 54 years old (OK), resides in Kihara City (OK). Health check was in January last year, which is more than one year before April this year. (FAIL) - ๆœจๆ‘ใ•ใ‚“ (Kimura): 34 years old (OK), works in Kihara City (OK). Health check was in October last year, which is within one year of April this year. (PASS) - ๅคงๅทใ•ใ‚“ (Okawa): 16 years old. Fails the age requirement (must be 18 or older). (FAIL) - ใƒใ‚งใ•ใ‚“ (Che): 27 years old (OK), resides and works in Kihara City (OK). Health check is scheduled for May this year, which is *after* the April class date. (FAIL) Therefore, only ๆœจๆ‘ใ•ใ‚“ (Kimura) is eligible.

Why other options are incorrect:
ใƒ€ใƒ‹ใ‚จใƒซใ•ใ‚“

ใƒ€ใƒ‹ใ‚จใƒซใ•ใ‚“ (Daniel) received his health check-up in January of last year, which is more than one year before the class date in April of this year. The requirement is 'within 1 year'.

ๅคงๅทใ•ใ‚“

ๅคงๅทใ•ใ‚“ (Okawa) is 16 years old, but the eligibility requires participants to be 18 years or older.

ใƒใ‚งใ•ใ‚“

ใƒใ‚งใ•ใ‚“ (Che) is scheduled to receive her health check-up in May of this year, which is *after* the class date in April. The check-up must be received *before* the class date.

Question 66

ใ‚ทใƒฃใƒ’ใƒณใ•ใ‚“ใฏใ€ๆฅ้€ฑใฎใ€Œใƒ€ใƒณใ‚นAใ€ใ‚’ไบˆ็ด„ใ—ใŸใŒใ€็ฉบใใŒใ‚ใ‚Œใฐๆฅ้€ฑใฎใ€Œไฝ“ๆ“ใ€ใ‚‚่ฟฝๅŠ ไบˆ็ด„ใ—ใŸใ„ใจ่€ƒใˆใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ€‚ใฉใ†ใ™ใ‚Œใฐใ„ใ„ใ‹ใ€‚

1.ๆฅ้€ฑใฎๆœˆๆ›œๆ—ฅไปฅ้™ใซ็ช“ๅฃใ‹้›ป่ฉฑใง็ฉบใใ‚’็ขบ่ชใ—ใ€็ฉบใใŒใ‚ใ‚Œใฐใ€็ช“ๅฃใงไบˆ็ด„ใ™ใ‚‹ใ€‚
2.ๆฅ้€ฑใฎๆœˆๆ›œๆ—ฅไปฅ้™ใซ็ช“ๅฃใ‹้›ป่ฉฑใง็ฉบใใ‚’็ขบ่ชใ—ใ€็ฉบใใŒใ‚ใ‚Œใฐใ€ไบˆ็ด„ๆฉŸใ‹้›ป่ฉฑใงไบˆ็ด„ใ™ใ‚‹ใ€‚
3.ๆฅ้€ฑใฎๆฐดๆ›œๆ—ฅไปฅ้™ใซ็ช“ๅฃใ‹้›ป่ฉฑใง็ฉบใใ‚’็ขบ่ชใ—ใ€็ฉบใใŒใ‚ใ‚Œใฐใ€็ช“ๅฃใงไบˆ็ด„ใ™ใ‚‹ใ€‚
4.ๆฅ้€ฑใฎๆฐดๆ›œๆ—ฅไปฅ้™ใซ็ช“ๅฃใ‹้›ป่ฉฑใง็ฉบใใ‚’็ขบ่ชใ—ใ€็ฉบใใŒใ‚ใ‚Œใฐใ€ไบˆ็ด„ๆฉŸใ‹้›ป่ฉฑใงไบˆ็ด„ใ™ใ‚‹ใ€‚ Correct
Correct Answer: 4. ๆฅ้€ฑใฎๆฐดๆ›œๆ—ฅไปฅ้™ใซ็ช“ๅฃใ‹้›ป่ฉฑใง็ฉบใใ‚’็ขบ่ชใ—ใ€็ฉบใใŒใ‚ใ‚Œใฐใ€ไบˆ็ด„ๆฉŸใ‹้›ป่ฉฑใงไบˆ็ด„ใ™ใ‚‹ใ€‚
Detailed Explanation
Why this is correct:

ใ‚ทใƒฃใƒ’ใƒณใ•ใ‚“ (Shahin) wants to make an additional reservation for 'ไฝ“ๆ“' (Gymnastics) next week. According to the '่ฟฝๅŠ ไบˆ็ด„' (additional reservation) rules: 1. Additional reservations are only possible for classes that have not reached capacity 2 days before the class date. 'ไฝ“ๆ“' is on Friday, so 2 days before is Wednesday. 2. Availability can be checked from 2 days before the class date at the Health Promotion Center window or by phone. 3. For second-time or later reservations, one can use the reservation machine or phone. Therefore, Shahin should check availability by window or phone from next Wednesday onwards, and if there's an opening, make the reservation using the reservation machine or phone. Option 4, 'ๆฅ้€ฑใฎๆฐดๆ›œๆ—ฅไปฅ้™ใซ็ช“ๅฃใ‹้›ป่ฉฑใง็ฉบใใ‚’็ขบ่ชใ—ใ€็ฉบใใŒใ‚ใ‚Œใฐใ€ไบˆ็ด„ๆฉŸใ‹้›ป่ฉฑใงไบˆ็ด„ใ™ใ‚‹ใ€‚' (Check availability at the window or by phone from next Wednesday onwards, and if there's an opening, make the reservation using the reservation machine or phone), is the correct procedure.

Why other options are incorrect:
ๆฅ้€ฑใฎๆœˆๆ›œๆ—ฅไปฅ้™ใซ็ช“ๅฃใ‹้›ป่ฉฑใง็ฉบใใ‚’็ขบ่ชใ—ใ€็ฉบใใŒใ‚ใ‚Œใฐใ€็ช“ๅฃใงไบˆ็ด„ใ™ใ‚‹ใ€‚

The availability for additional reservations can be checked 2 days before the class. 'ไฝ“ๆ“' is on Friday, so 2 days before is Wednesday, not Monday. Also, for second-time reservations, the reservation machine or phone can be used, not just the window.

ๆฅ้€ฑใฎๆœˆๆ›œๆ—ฅไปฅ้™ใซ็ช“ๅฃใ‹้›ป่ฉฑใง็ฉบใใ‚’็ขบ่ชใ—ใ€็ฉบใใŒใ‚ใ‚Œใฐใ€ไบˆ็ด„ๆฉŸใ‹้›ป่ฉฑใงไบˆ็ด„ใ™ใ‚‹ใ€‚

The availability for additional reservations can be checked 2 days before the class. 'ไฝ“ๆ“' is on Friday, so 2 days before is Wednesday, not Monday.

ๆฅ้€ฑใฎๆฐดๆ›œๆ—ฅไปฅ้™ใซ็ช“ๅฃใ‹้›ป่ฉฑใง็ฉบใใ‚’็ขบ่ชใ—ใ€็ฉบใใŒใ‚ใ‚Œใฐใ€็ช“ๅฃใงไบˆ็ด„ใ™ใ‚‹ใ€‚

While checking availability from Wednesday onwards is correct, for second-time reservations, the reservation machine or phone can be used, not just the window.